Literature DB >> 9104004

Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect.

S Suzuki1, P Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Attention was focused at a specific location either by a briefly flashed cue (cue-induced attention) or by a voluntary effort (voluntary attention). In both cases, briefly presented probes appeared displaced away from the focus of attention. The results showed that the effect of cue-induced attention was transient whereas the effect of voluntary attention was long lasting. The repulsion effect was most evident with brief probe durations (< 200 ms). Control experiments ruled out nonattentional hypotheses based on classic figural aftereffects and apparent motion. Although a number of studies have demonstrated enhancements of visual perception at attended locations, the present studies show that focused attention can distort the encoding of nearby positions. Speculation is offered that the repulsion effect is one of the costs involved in the allocation of more resources to the focus of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9104004     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.2.443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  57 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The attentional repulsion effect in perception and action.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The time course of spatial memory distortions.

Authors:  Steffen Werner; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

5.  Attention alters feature space in motion processing.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Saccades create similar mislocalizations in visual and auditory space.

Authors:  Hannah M Krüger; Thérèse Collins; Bernhard Englitz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Representation of dynamic events triggered by motion lines and static human postures.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Tau and Kappa effects in physical space: the case of audition.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Sarrazin; Marie-Dominique Giraudo; John Bruce Pittenger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-07

9.  Perceptual latency priming: a measure of attentional facilitation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

10.  Target recovery in metacontrast: the effect of contrast.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Steven Todd; Lynn Mardon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.