Literature DB >> 12219889

The time course of spatial memory distortions.

Steffen Werner1, Jörn Diedrichsen.   

Abstract

Four experiments investigated the memory distortions for the location of a dot in relation to two horizontally aligned landmarks. In Experiment 1, participants reproduced from memory a dot location with respect to the two landmarks. Their performance showed a systematic pattern of distortion that was consistent across individual participants. The three subsequent experiments investigated the time course of spatial memory distortions. Using a visual discrimination task, we were able to map the emergence of spatial distortions within the first 800 msec of the retention interval. After retention intervals as brief as 50 msec, a distortion was already present. In all but one experiment, the distortion increased with longer retention intervals. This early onset of spatial memory distortions might reflect the almost immediate decay of detailed spatial information and the early influence of an enduring spatial memory representation, which encodes spatial information in terms of the perceived structure of space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219889     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  Category effects on estimates of stimuli: perception or reconstruction?

Authors:  L E Crawford; J Huttenlocher; P H Engebretson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs.

Authors:  D J Schiano; B Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

3.  Compression of space in visual memory.

Authors:  B R Sheth; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.

Authors:  B Laeng; M Peters; B McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

6.  Relative efficiency for the detection of apparent motion.

Authors:  B L Gros; D R Pope; T E Cohn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.

Authors:  C M Moore; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Probing the time course of representational momentum.

Authors:  J J Freyd; J Q Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.

Authors:  S C Hirtle; J Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05
View more
  17 in total

1.  Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  When anticipation beats accuracy: Threat alters memory for dynamic scenes.

Authors:  Michael Greenstein; Nancy Franklin; Mariana Martins; Christine Sewack; Markus A Meier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  Memory for word location during reading: eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ulrich W Weger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

4.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Spatial span under translation: a study of reference frames.

Authors:  S E Avons
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

6.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Cue usage in memory for location when orientation is fixed.

Authors:  Sylvia Fitting; Douglas H Wedell; Gary L Allen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

8.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17

10.  Generality with specificity: the dynamic field theory generalizes across tasks and time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; John P Spencer
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.