Literature DB >> 16944106

Representation of dynamic events triggered by motion lines and static human postures.

Takahiro Kawabe1, Kayo Miura.   

Abstract

Artists and cartoonists are able to dexterously depict a running person on paper with the aid of 'motion lines'. We scientifically examined whether the cognitive system can exploit motion lines in constructing memory representations of the location of a running person depicted in a still image. A target depicting a standing or a running person with or without motion lines was presented to participants for 500 ms. Observers were required to reproduce the location of the target 1 s after its disappearance. Data from depicted leftward and rightward moving persons were collapsed. Memory displacement of the target was shown to be largest in the presence of motion lines and a posture indicating an identical direction of movement. By assessing the absolute localization error, we showed that there was no localization advantage toward a target with a symmetrical (standing) posture over one with an asymmetrical (running) posture. Our findings indicate synergetic interaction between the mechanisms responsible for processing of motion lines and human postures in the representation of dynamic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944106     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0673-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction.

Authors:  W S Geisler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Motion parallel to line orientation: disambiguation of motion percepts.

Authors:  G Francis; H Kim
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Direct evidence that "speedlines" influence motion mechanisms.

Authors:  David C Burr; John Ross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A computational and perceptual account of motion lines.

Authors:  H Kim; G Francis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

6.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  S Suzuki; P Cavanagh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Static depiction of movement.

Authors:  C Carello; L Rosenblum; A Grosofsky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Cognitive representation of motion: evidence for friction and gravity analogues.

Authors:  T L Hubbard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed.

Authors:  J J Freyd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-06

10.  Metaphor in pictures.

Authors:  J M Kennedy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  2 in total

1.  The notion of the motion: the neurocognition of motion lines in visual narratives.

Authors:  Neil Cohn; Stephen Maher
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Implied motion perception from a still image in infancy.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.