Literature DB >> 9100364

Transient hovering performance of hummingbirds under conditions of maximal loading.

P Chai1, J S Chen, R Dudley.   

Abstract

Maximal load-lifting capacities of six ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) were determined under conditions of burst performance. Mechanical power output under maximal loading was then compared with maximal hovering performance in hypodense gas mixtures of normodense air and heliox. The maximal load lifted was similar at air temperatures of 5 and 25 degrees C, and averaged 80% of body mass. The duration of load-lifting was brief, of the order of 1 s, and was probably sustained via phosphagen substrates. Under maximal loading, estimates of muscle mass-specific mechanical power output assuming perfect elastic energy storage averaged 206 W kg-1, compared with 94 W kg-1 during free hovering without loading. Under conditions of limiting performance in hypodense mixtures, maximal mechanical power output was much lower (131 W kg-1, five birds) but was sustained for longer (4 s), demonstrating an inverse relationship between the magnitude and duration of maximum power output. In free hovering flight, stroke amplitude and wingbeat frequency varied in inverse proportion between 5 and 25 degrees C, suggesting thermoregulatory contributions by the flight muscles. Stroke amplitude under conditions of maximal loading reached a geometrical limit at slightly greater than 180 degrees. Previous studies of maximum performance in flying animals have estimated mechanical power output using a simplified actuator disk model without a detailed knowledge of wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude. The present load-lifting results, together with actuator disc estimates of induced power derived from hypodense heliox experiments, are congruent with previous load-lifting studies of maximum flight performance. For ruby-throated hummingbirds, the inclusion of wingbeat frequency and stroke amplitude in a more detailed aerodynamic model of hovering yields values of mechanical power output 34% higher than previous estimates. More generally, the study of performance limits in flying animals necessitates careful specification of behavioral context as well as quantitative determination of wing and body kinematics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9100364     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.5.921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  14 in total

1.  Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Kenneth C Welch; Brian H Cho; Danny B Welch; Amy F Lin; William B Dickson; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Allometry of hummingbird lifting performance.

Authors:  D L Altshuler; R Dudley; S M Heredia; J A McGuire
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Integrating morphology and kinematics in the scaling of hummingbird hovering metabolic rate and efficiency.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Donald R Powers; Bret W Tobalske; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Digital particle image velocimetry measurements of the downwash distribution of a desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Graham K Taylor; Nicholas J Lawson; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Wing flexibility enhances load-lifting capacity in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance.

Authors:  Jason T Vance; Jason B Williams; Michelle M Elekonich; Stephen P Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Kinematic plasticity during flight in fruit bats: individual variability in response to loading.

Authors:  Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Daniel K Riskin; Kenneth S Breuer; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.