Literature DB >> 20581280

Neuromuscular control of wingbeat kinematics in Anna's hummingbirds (Calypte anna).

Douglas L Altshuler1, Kenneth C Welch, Brian H Cho, Danny B Welch, Amy F Lin, William B Dickson, Michael H Dickinson.   

Abstract

Hummingbirds can maintain the highest wingbeat frequencies of any flying vertebrate - a feat accomplished by the large pectoral muscles that power the wing strokes. An unusual feature of these muscles is that they are activated by one or a few spikes per cycle as revealed by electromyogram recordings (EMGs). The relatively simple nature of this activation pattern provides an opportunity to understand how motor units are recruited to modulate limb kinematics. Hummingbirds made to fly in low-density air responded by moderately increasing wingbeat frequency and substantially increasing the wing stroke amplitude as compared with flight in normal air. There was little change in the number of spikes per EMG burst in the pectoralis major muscle between flight in normal and low-density heliox (mean=1.4 spikes cycle(-1)). However the spike amplitude, which we take to be an indication of the number of active motor units, increased in concert with the wing stroke amplitude, 1.7 times the value in air. We also challenged the hummingbirds using transient load lifting to elicit maximum burst performance. During maximum load lifting, both wing stroke amplitude and wingbeat frequency increased substantially above those values during hovering flight. The number of spikes per EMG burst increased to a mean of 3.3 per cycle, and the maximum spike amplitude increased to approximately 1.6 times those values during flight in heliox. These results suggest that hummingbirds recruit additional motor units (spatial recruitment) to regulate wing stroke amplitude but that temporal recruitment is also required to maintain maximum stroke amplitude at the highest wingbeat frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20581280      PMCID: PMC2892424          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.043497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  32 in total

1.  Fuel selection in rufous hummingbirds: ecological implications of metabolic biochemistry.

Authors:  R K Suarez; J R Lighton; C D Moyes; G S Brown; C L Gass; P W Hochachka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Hummingbird flight: sustaining the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among vertebrates.

Authors:  R K Suarez
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1992-06-15

3.  Modulation of pectoralis muscle function in budgerigars Melopsitaccus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata in response to changing flight speed.

Authors:  David J Ellerby; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Flight muscle enzymes and metabolic flux rates during hovering flight of the nectar bat, Glossophaga soricina: further evidence of convergence with hummingbirds.

Authors:  R K Suarez; K C Welch; S K Hanna; L G Herrera M
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 2.320

5.  Role of syringeal muscles in controlling the phonology of bird song.

Authors:  F Goller; R A Suthers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The whistle and the rattle: the design of sound producing muscles.

Authors:  L C Rome; D A Syme; S Hollingworth; S L Lindstedt; S M Baylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance.

Authors:  David J Ellerby; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Fiber type homogeneity of the flight musculature in small birds.

Authors:  Kenneth C Welch; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Pectoralis muscle performance during ascending and slow level flight in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos).

Authors:  M R Williamson; K P Dial; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  Myosin isoforms in mammalian skeletal muscle.

Authors:  S Schiaffino; C Reggiani
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1994-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Using computational and mechanical models to study animal locomotion.

Authors:  Laura A Miller; Daniel I Goldman; Tyson L Hedrick; Eric D Tytell; Z Jane Wang; Jeannette Yen; Silas Alben
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Evolution of avian flight: muscles and constraints on performance.

Authors:  Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Hovering hummingbird wing aerodynamics during the annual cycle. I. Complete wing.

Authors:  Yonathan Achache; Nir Sapir; Yossef Elimelech
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Burst muscle performance predicts the speed, acceleration, and turning performance of Anna's hummingbirds.

Authors:  Paolo S Segre; Roslyn Dakin; Victor B Zordan; Michael H Dickinson; Andrew D Straw; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.