Literature DB >> 12845465

Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning.

Ansgar Malich1, Mirjam Facius, Roselle Anderson, Joachim Böttcher, Dieter Sauner, Andreas Hansch, Christiane Marx, Alexander Petrovitch, Stefan Pfleiderer, Werner Kaiser.   

Abstract

Cancer cells exhibit altered local dielectric properties which can be assessed using electrical impedance scanning (EIS). The study was aimed at clarifying influence of lesion size and depth on EIS performance. From a series of 387 lesions (129 malignant and 258 benign) from 363 patients being sonographically and/or mammographically evaluated, size and depth information was not available in 112 lesions, size was available in 86 lesions and additional depth information was available in 189 lesions, respectively, while performing EIS. Lesions were either histologically verified or had a follow-up of at least 2 years. One hundred three of 129 malignant lesions and 165 of 258 benign lesions were correctly detected (sensitivity 79.8%, specificity 64.0%, accuracy 71.9%). Sensitivity without knowledge of size and depth was 64.6% (10 of 16 malignant lesions detected). This value increased to 76.2% (32 of 42) with knowledge of the size and further increased to 85.9% with knowledge of size and depth (61 of 71). Specificity values in the three subgroups were almost similar: 64.6 (62 of 96), 65.9 (29 of 44), and 62.7% (74 of 118), respectively. Accuracy rises from 63.6% (without knowledge of size/depth) to 71.1 and 74.3% (with size knowledge and with size and depth knowledge, respectively). Accuracy of EIS improved significantly by including sonographical information about depth and size into the analysis. Ultrasound examination should be performed prior to EIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12845465     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1988-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

1.  Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions.

Authors:  A Malich; T Böhm; M Facius; M Freessmeyer; M Fleck; R Anderson; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].

Authors:  M H Fuchsjäger; T H Helbich; H Ringl; M A Funovics; M Rudas; C Riedl; G Pfarl
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-12

3.  Novel EIS postprocessing algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Yaël A Glickman; Orna Filo; Udi Nachaliel; Sarah Lenington; Sigal Amin-Spector; Ron Ginor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues.

Authors:  A J Surowiec; S S Stuchly; J B Barr; A Swarup
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnosis.

Authors:  Gonzalo Martín; Rocío Martín; María Jesús Brieva; Luis Santamaría
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements.

Authors:  G Piperno; E H Frei; M Moshitzky
Journal:  Front Med Biol Eng       Date:  1990

8.  Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses.

Authors:  Kenneth J W Taylor; Christopher Merritt; Catherine Piccoli; Robert Schmidt; Glenn Rouse; Bruno Fornage; Eva Rubin; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Fred Winsberg; Barry Goldberg; Ellen Mendelson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue.

Authors:  J Jossinet
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.833

10.  Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.

Authors:  A Malich; T Boehm; M Facius; M G Freesmeyer; M Fleck; R Anderson; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  3 in total

1.  Novel electrode-skin interface for breast electrical impedance scanning.

Authors:  Zhenyu Ji; Xiuzhen Dong; Xuetao Shi; Fusheng You; Feng Fu; Ruigang Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Electric impedance microflow cytometry for characterization of cell disease states.

Authors:  E Du; Sungjae Ha; Monica Diez-Silva; Ming Dao; Subra Suresh; Anantha P Chandrakasan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Monofrequency electrical impedance mammography (EIM) diagnostic system in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Blanca Murillo-Ortiz; Abraham Hernández-Ramírez; Talia Rivera-Villanueva; David Suárez-García; Mario Murguía-Pérez; Sandra Martínez-Garza; Allyson Rodríguez-Penin; Rosario Romero-Coripuna; Xiomara Midory López-Partida
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.