Literature DB >> 9094076

Slice location dependence of aortic regurgitation measurements with MR phase velocity mapping.

G P Chatzimavroudis1, P G Walker, J N Oshinski, R H Franch, R I Pettigrew, A P Yoganathan.   

Abstract

Although several methods have been used clinically to assess aortic regurgitation (AR), there is no "gold standard" for regurgitant volume measurement. Magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) can be used for noninvasive blood flow measurements. To evaluate the accuracy of PVM in quantifying AR with a single imaging slice in the ascending aorta, in vitro experiments were performed by using a compliant aortic model. Attention was focused on determining the slice location that provided the best results. The most accurate measurements were taken between the aortic valve annulus and the coronary ostia where the measured (Y) and actual (X) flow rate had close agreement (Y = 0.954 x + 0.126, r2 = 0.995, standard deviation of error = 0.139 L/min). Beyond the coronary ostia, coronary flow and aortic compliance negatively affected the accuracy of the measurements. In vivo measurements taken on patients with AR showed the same tendency with the in vitro results. In making decisions regarding patient treatment, diagnostic accuracy is very important. The results from this study suggest that higher accuracy is achieved by placing the slice between the aortic valve and the coronary ostia and that this is the region where attention should be focused for further clinical investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9094076     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910370412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performance by magnetic resonance velocity imaging.

Authors:  R Botnar; E Nagel; M B Scheidegger; E M Pedersen; O Hess; P Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Calculations of cardiovascular shunts and regurgitation using magnetic resonance ventricular volume and aortic and pulmonary flow measurements.

Authors:  Daniel G H Devos; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ramkumar Krishnamurthy; Benjamin Cheong; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04

5.  Direct measurement of aortic regurgitation with phase-contrast magnetic resonance is inaccurate: proposal of an alternative method of quantification.

Authors:  Yoichi Iwamoto; Akio Inage; George Tomlinson; Kyong Jin Lee; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Mike Seed; Andrea Wan; Shi-Joon Yoo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-06-18

6.  [The use of cross-sectional imaging modalities in the diagnosis of valvular heart disease].

Authors:  M Gutberlet; H Abdul-Khaliq; H Stobbe; M Fröhlich; B Spors; F Knollmann; P Lange; R Hetzer; R Felix
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

7.  The quantification of pulmonary valve haemodynamics using MRI.

Authors:  Scott A Reid; Peter G Walker; John Fisher; Z Nagy; John P Ridgway; Kevin G Watterson; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Quantitating aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: significant variations due to slice location and breath holding.

Authors:  Abhishek Chaturvedi; Christian Hamilton-Craig; Peter J Cawley; Lee M Mitsumori; Catherine M Otto; Jeffrey H Maki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management.

Authors:  Roshin C Mathew; Adrián I Löffler; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.