Literature DB >> 24445782

[The use of cross-sectional imaging modalities in the diagnosis of valvular heart disease].

M Gutberlet1, H Abdul-Khaliq, H Stobbe, M Fröhlich, B Spors, F Knollmann, P Lange, R Hetzer, R Felix.   

Abstract

Exact visualization of valve morphology seems to be possible with the cross-sectional imaging modalities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the recently introduced technique of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). These techniques are used, if other non-invasive imaging modalities, like echocardiography, fail or provide only insufficient information. This commonly occurs in the assessment of right ventricular valves. Quantification of valve stenosis is possible by calculating valve orifice area, which can be performed with MRI and MDCT. An estimation of the instantaneous peak gradient can only be achieved by MR flow measurements. MR flow measurement is a reliable method to quantify the degree of mild to moderate stenoses. Quantification of valve regurgitation is possible by measurement of the regurgitation fraction with MR flow measurements as well as with MR volumetry/CT volumetry. But only the MR flow measurement is suitable for the quantification of valve regurgitation in patients with multiple valves involved or cardiac shunting. MRI and probably MDCT are the most reliable methods in the evaluation of ventricular volumes and therefore suitable for the follow-up in patients with valvular heart disease, because changes in volumes are important for therapeutic decisions in these patients. The crucial advantages of MRI compared to CT in the diagnostic of valvular heart diseases however are the absence of radiation exposure, the possibility of quantitative evaluation of valves function using flow measurements and the higher temporal resolution as compared to MDCT.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 24445782     DOI: 10.1007/s003920170002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  38 in total

1.  Long-term effectiveness of operations for ascending aortic dissections.

Authors:  J F Sabik; B W Lytle; E H Blackstone; P M McCarthy; F D Loop; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  From signal to image: magnetic resonance imaging physics for cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  R V Mulkern; T Chung
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Heart motion adapted cine phase-contrast flow measurements through the aortic valve.

Authors:  S Kozerke; M B Scheidegger; E M Pedersen; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Advantages and limitations of methods to detect, localize, and quantitate intracardiac left-to-right shunting.

Authors:  J D Boehrer; R A Lange; J E Willard; P A Grayburn; L D Hillis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation.

Authors:  W A Kalender; W Seissler; E Klotz; P Vock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  C B Higgins; B F Byrd; D W Farmer; L Osaki; N H Silverman; M D Cheitlin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Tumors of the cardiac valves: imaging findings in magnetic resonance imaging, electron beam computed tomography, and echocardiography.

Authors:  B J Wintersperger; C R Becker; H Gulbins; A Knez; R Bruening; A Heuck; M F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Severity of aortic regurgitation: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.

Authors:  M C Dulce; G H Mostbeck; M O'Sullivan; M Cheitlin; G R Caputo; C B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Cardiac imaging with a high-speed Cine-CT Scanner: preliminary results.

Authors:  M J Lipton; C B Higgins; D Farmer; D P Boyd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Value of transesophageal echocardiography as an adjunct to transthoracic echocardiography in evaluation of native and prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  W R Pedersen; M Walker; J D Olson; F Gobel; H W Lange; J A Daniel; J Rogers; T Longe; M Kane; M R Mooney
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: from imaging to diagnosis].

Authors:  M Gutberlet
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation].

Authors:  M Gutberlet; B Foldyna; M Grothoff; C Lücke; F Riese; S Nitzsche; M Haensig; K von Aspern; D Holzhey; H Thiele; G Schuler; A Linke; F-W Mohr; L Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Analysis of circumflex artery anatomy by real time 3D transesophageal echocardiography compared to cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Carmine Bevilacqua; Sarah Eibel; Borek Foldyna; Thomas Knoefler; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Matthias Gutberlet; Chirojit Mukherjee; Joerg Seeburger; Piroze Davierwala; Joerg Ender
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.