Literature DB >> 9093153

Influence of osteophytic size on bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

T Rand1, B Schneider, S Grampp, P Wunderbaldinger, H Migsits, H Imhof.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the relationship between individual osteophytic size and measured bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Further, to evaluate the possible consequences of this relationship for the management of DXA measurements in postmenopausal patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 142 postmenopausal women (mean age 61.8 +/- 8.9 years), plain radiographs of the lumbar spine were evaluated and graded according to evidence and size of osteophytes. The BMD (g/cm2) and Z-score (deviation of BMD from an age-matched population, %) of each vertebral body was determined by DXA. The effects of the individual osteophytic size on BMD measurements were analyzed by using analysis of variance followed by a multiple test procedure.
RESULTS: The presence of osteophytes resulted in a significant increase in BMD of L1 through L4. The increase in relation to an osteophytic size of about 10 mm was: in L1 5.7%, in L2 6.8%, in L3 4.4% and in L4 3.5%. Increases were significantly higher for an osteophytic size of 10-20 mm (L1 23.1%, L2 13.0%, L3 13.4%, and L4 16.3%) and of > 20 mm (L1 21.4%, L2 22.4%, L3 21.1% and L4 4.1%).
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a nonlinear increase of measured BMD with increasing osteophytic size. These effects should be considered in routine examination and patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9093153     DOI: 10.1080/02841859709172051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine--implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women.

Authors:  M Tenne; F McGuigan; J Besjakov; P Gerdhem; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  [Pitfalls and difficulties in interpretation of bone densitometry].

Authors:  R Scholz; G Borte; G von Salis-Soglio; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Impact of degenerative spinal diseases on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in elderly women.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Muraki; Seizo Yamamoto; Hideaki Ishibashi; Toshiyuki Horiuchi; Takayuki Hosoi; Hajime Orimo; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The importance of severity of arthrosis for the reliability of bone mineral density measurement in women.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; Begumhan Baysal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  Vertebral body integrity: a review of various anatomical factors involved in the lumbar region.

Authors:  L V Prabhu; V V Saralaya; M M Pai; A V Ranade; G Singh; S Madhyastha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Measuring forearm bone density instead of lumbar spine bone density improves the sensitivity of diagnosing osteoporosis in older adults with cardiovascular diseases: Data from SARCOS study.

Authors:  Alberto Frisoli; Angela T Paes; Amanda Diniz Kimura; Elaine Azevedo; Valdir Ambrosio
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.