Literature DB >> 17404781

Vertebral body integrity: a review of various anatomical factors involved in the lumbar region.

L V Prabhu, V V Saralaya, M M Pai, A V Ranade, G Singh, S Madhyastha.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The body of the vertebra can be affected in the majority of the conditions involving the lumbar spine. Multiple references, both books and periodicals, have been reviewed, and the anatomical factors responsible for the vertebral body integrity in the lumbar spine have been included under the following important areas, namely, morphology, development, genetics, microscopic examination using histology, structural architecture, blood supply, neuromuscular control, and biomechanics.
INTRODUCTION: The anatomy provides a three-dimensional frame work to support the interaction between the physiological and pathological alterations. The body of the vertebra can be affected in a majority of acute or chronic conditions involving the lumbar spine. The etiology of these conditions is multifactorial, which has been dealt with in previous studies sporadically. This study aims to review and incorporate the important anatomical factors which can influence the integrity of vertebral bodies in the lumbar region and manifest as low back pain.
METHODS: Multiple references, both books and periodicals, have been reviewed for the literature. Electronic databases, including Medline and PubMed, were used to collect the latest information. They were finally arranged in an anatomical framework for the article. An attempt has been made to cover these relevant issues in an integrated way in the article and have been structured into introduction, morphology, development, genetics, microscopic examination using histology, structural architecture, blood supply, neuromuscular control, biomechanics, and conclusion. The aforementioned anatomical aspects, some of which have received less attention in the literature, may be helpful to clinicians for restoring the mobility, stability, and load bearing capacity of the lumbar spine as well as planning better management strategies, especially for the chronic low back pain.
RESULTS: In our article all the anatomical factors affecting the integrity of vertebral body, including the morphology, development, genetics, growth and ossification, blood supply, specifically in the lumbar region, have been described, which were not covered earlier. The limitations of this review is its wide dimensions; hence, there are fair scopes of missing many relevant facts, as all of them cannot be compiled in a single article. We have attempted to confine our views to different anatomical domains only, this is our second limitation. Additional studies are required to incorporate and discuss the uncovered relevant scientific details.
CONCLUSIONS: The integrity of the body of the lumbar vertebra is multifactorial (Fig. 8). The vast spectrum of the anatomical domain influencing it has been summarized. The evolution of erect posture is a landmark in the morphology of human beings and the lumbar lordosis, which has also contributed to the gross design of the vertebral body, is one of the most important adaptations for axial loading and bipedal movements. The role of metamerism in the evolution of vertebrate morphology is repeated in the development of spine. The body of the vertebra is intersegmental in origin, which results in dual vascular and nerve supply, both from superior and inferior aspects of the body of the lumbar vertebrae. The vertebral body ossifies from three primary centers, one for centrum, which will form the major portion of body, and the other two for neural arches. The cartilaginous growth plate is mainly responsible for the longitudinal vertebral growth. Regional differentiation of the vertebral column, and the definite pattern of the structure of the different vertebra, is regulated by a large number of genetic factors, including the Hox genes. The vertebral body design therefore provides the requirements for optimal load transfer by maximal strength with minimal weight. Bone mineral density (BMD), bone quality, microarchitecture, and material properties are the important factors that contribute to bone strength. BMD is highly heritable; bone mineral distribution and architecture are also shown to be under strong genetic influence. All the aforementioned factors finally integrate to ensure mainly the mobility, stability, and load bearing capacity of the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404781     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0373-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   5.071


  93 in total

1.  Inhomogeneity of human vertebral cancellous bone: systematic density and structure patterns inside the vertebral body.

Authors:  X Banse; J P Devogelaer; E Munting; C Delloye; O Cornu; M Grynpas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The mechanics of back-extensor torque production about the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Karl Daggfeldt; Alf Thorstensson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Genetic determination of variation and covariation of bone mineral density at the hip and spine in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Wei-Xia Jian; Ji-Rong Long; Miao-Xin Li; Xiang-Hua Liu; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution.

Authors:  J Homminga; H Weinans; W Gowin; D Felsenberg; R Huiskes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Muscle lines-of-action affect predicted forces in optimization-based spine muscle modeling.

Authors:  M A Nussbaum; D B Chaffin; C J Rechtien
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The prevalence of vertebral fractures in mild ankylosing spondylitis and their relationship to bone mineral density.

Authors:  D Mitra; D M Elvins; D J Speden; A J Collins
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Vitamin D status, trunk muscle strength, body sway, falls, and fractures among 237 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Pfeifer; B Begerow; H W Minne; T Schlotthauer; M Pospeschill; M Scholz; A D Lazarescu; W Pollähne
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.949

9.  A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; John D Wark; Nicola L Fazzalari; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Muscle strength in osteoporotic versus normal women.

Authors:  M Sinaki; S Khosla; P J Limburg; J W Rogers; P A Murtaugh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  9 in total

1.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures without compression: key factors of diagnosis and initial outcome of treatment with cement augmentation.

Authors:  Haiqing Mao; Jun Zou; Dechun Geng; Xuesong Zhu; Mo Zhu; Weimin Jiang; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Bone mineral density, body mass index, postmenopausal period and outcomes of low back pain treatment in Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jongbae J Park; Joonshik Shin; Yousuk Youn; Catherine Champagne; Eunseok Jin; Soonsung Hong; Kwanhye Jung; Sangho Lee; Sunkyu Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pathophysiology and biomechanics of the aging spine.

Authors:  Michael Papadakis; Georgios Sapkas; Elias C Papadopoulos; Pavlos Katonis
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-09-19

4.  Photoelastic analisys in the lower region of vertebral body L4.

Authors:  Sarah Fakher Fakhouri; Ariane Zamarioli; Marcos Massao Shimano; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino; Cleudmar Amaral Araujo; Antonio Carlos Shimano
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 5.  What is the Current Evidence on Vertebral Body Osteonecrosis?: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Andrea Zanirato; Luca Cavagnaro; Marco Basso; Stefano Divano; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-06-04

6.  Vertebral Body Avascular Osteonecrosis: An Unusual Late Complication of Tracheostomy.

Authors:  Alexander Rozov; Valentina Dubov; Evgenia Cherniavsky; Eli Magen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-25

7.  Comparison between Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Posterior Fixation Combined with Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Stage III Kümmell's Disease without Neurological Deficit.

Authors:  Yijie Liu; Yi Zhu; Renjie Li; Weimin Jiang; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 8.  Failed percutaneous kyphoplasty in treatment of stage 3 Kummell disease: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Chenggui Zhang; Guodong Wang; Xiaoyang Liu; Yang Li; Jianmin Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Growth and Bone Development in the Horse: When Is a Horse Skeletally Mature?

Authors:  Chris W Rogers; Erica K Gee; Keren E Dittmer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.