Literature DB >> 9092606

Differential expression of alpha-gustducin in taste bud populations of the rat and hamster.

J D Boughter1, D W Pumplin, C Yu, R C Christy, D V Smith.   

Abstract

The G-protein subunit alpha-gustducin, which is similar to rod transducin, has been implicated in the transduction of both sweet- and bitter-tasting substances. In rodents, there are differences in sensitivity to sweet and bitter stimuli in different populations of taste buds. Rat fungiform taste buds are more responsive to salts than to sweet stimuli, whereas those on the palate respond predominantly to sweet substances. In contrast, hamster fungiform taste buds are more sensitive to sweet-tasting stimuli. Taste buds in the vallate and foliate papillae of both species are sensitive to bitter compounds. These differences in sensitivity should be reflected in the numbers of gustducin-containing cells in different taste bud populations. We examined taste buds in the rat and hamster for immunoreactivity to an antibody against alpha-gustducin. Immunofluorescence of labeled taste cells was examined by confocal microscopy, and the cells were counted. Gustducin-positive cells were seen in all taste bud regions; they were spindle-shaped, with circular cross-sections and apical processes that extended to the taste pore. Cells with this characteristic shape in rat vallate taste buds are Type II (light) cells. In the rat, taste buds of the fungiform papillae had fewer gustducin-positive cells (3.1/taste bud) than those of other regions, including the posterior tongue and palate (>8.9/taste bud). Hamster fungiform taste buds contained twice as many gustducin-expressing cells (6.8/taste bud) as those of the rat. These data support the hypothesis that alpha-gustducin is involved in the transduction of both sweet- and bitter-tasting stimuli by mammalian taste receptor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9092606      PMCID: PMC6573105     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

Review 1.  Chemosensory transduction mechanisms in taste.

Authors:  S C Kinnamon; T A Cummings
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 19.318

2.  FINE STRUCTURE OF THE TASTE BUD.

Authors:  A I FARBMAN
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1965-04

3.  The response spectrum of taste fibres in the cat: a single fibre analysis.

Authors:  M J COHEN; S HAGIWARA; Y ZOTTERMAN
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1955-08-19

Review 4.  Chemoreception: tasting the sweet and the bitter.

Authors:  B Lindemann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Light and dark cells of rat vallate taste buds are morphologically distinct cell types.

Authors:  D W Pumplin; C Yu; D V Smith
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-02-17       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 6.  G proteins: transducers of receptor-generated signals.

Authors:  A G Gilman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Response characteristics of three taste nerves in mice.

Authors:  T Shingai; L M Beidler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-06-03       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Ultrastructure of mouse vallate taste buds. I. Taste cells and their associated synapses.

Authors:  J C Kinnamon; B J Taylor; R J Delay; S D Roper
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1985-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The effect of bilateral sectioning of the chorda tympani and the greater superficial petrosal nerves on the sweet taste in the rat.

Authors:  R F Krimm; M S Nejad; J C Smith; I J Miller; L M Beidler
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1987

10.  An analysis of hamster afferent taste nerve response functions.

Authors:  M Frank
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  32 in total

1.  Erb and c-Kit receptors have distinctive patterns of expression in adult and developing taste papillae and taste buds.

Authors:  S K McLaughlin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Postnatal development of membrane excitability in taste cells of the mouse vallate papilla.

Authors:  Albertino Bigiani; Rosella Cristiani; Francesca Fieni; Valeria Ghiaroni; Paola Bagnoli; Pierangelo Pietra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Role of the G-protein subunit alpha-gustducin in taste cell responses to bitter stimuli.

Authors:  Alejandro Caicedo; Elizabeth Pereira; Robert F Margolskee; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  An axis of good and awful in odor reception.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Alternative splicing of neuroligin and its protein distribution in the outer plexiform layer of the chicken retina.

Authors:  Karl J Wahlin; Laszlo Hackler; Ruben Adler; Donald J Zack
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  In vivo recordings from rat geniculate ganglia: taste response properties of individual greater superficial petrosal and chorda tympani neurones.

Authors:  Suzanne I Sollars; David L Hill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Cell communication in taste buds.

Authors:  S D Roper
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-2 is the ecto-ATPase of type I cells in taste buds.

Authors:  Dianna L Bartel; Susan L Sullivan; Elise G Lavoie; Jean Sévigny; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Using biosensors to detect the release of serotonin from taste buds during taste stimulation.

Authors:  Y J Huang; Y Maruyama; K S Lu; E Pereira; I Plonsky; J E Baur; D Wu; S D Roper
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Type II and III Taste Bud Cells Preferentially Expressed Kainate Glutamate Receptors in Rats.

Authors:  Sang-Bok Lee; Cil-Han Lee; Se-Nyun Kim; Ki-Myung Chung; Young-Kyung Cho; Kyung-Nyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.