Literature DB >> 9089045

The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma.

T Tarcan1, L Türkeri, T Biren, S Küllü, N Gürmen, A Akdaş.   

Abstract

Findings on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in local staging of prostatic carcinoma (PCa) were compared with the final pathological staging in 30 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. We found TRUS and MRI to have the same accuracy rate (53%) in local staging, whereas CT revealed a lower accuracy rate with 47%. TRUS revealed the highest accuracy rate in detecting seminal vesicle invasion with 70%, and MRI in invasion of periprostatic tissue with 67%. Although it revealed similar efficiency as MRI, TRUS should be considered as the first line modality in local staging of PCa in light of its relatively high accuracy rate, cost effectiveness and case in performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9089045     DOI: 10.1007/bf02550726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  14 in total

1.  Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S A McSherry; F Levy; M L Schiebler; B Keefe; G A Dent; J L Mohler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  1992 staging system for prostate cancer.

Authors:  J E Montie
Journal:  Semin Urol       Date:  1993-02

3.  Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  J F Martin; P Hajek; L Baker; V Gylys-Morin; R Fitzmorris-Glass; R R Mattrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prostatic disorders: MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  M E Phillips; H Y Kressel; C E Spritzer; P H Arger; A J Wein; D Marinelli; L Axel; W B Gefter; H M Pollack
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Computerized tomography and transrectal ultrasound in the assessment of local extension of prostatic cancer before radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  J O Salo; L Kivisaari; S Rannikko; T Lehtonen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Carcinoma of the prostate: a study of 213 patients with stage C tumors treated by total perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  F H Schroeder; E Belt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Preoperative evaluation of localized prostatic carcinoma by transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  J E Pontes; S Eisenkraft; H Watanabe; H Ohe; M Saitoh; G P Murphy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Accuracy of imaging modalities in staging the local extent of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Ebert; B J Schmitz-Dräger; K F Bürrig; S Miller; N Pauli; T Kahn; R Ackermann
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  The value of computerized tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostatic carcinoma: comparison with the clinical and histological staging.

Authors:  E Mukamel; J Hannah; Z Barbaric; J B deKernion
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging.

Authors:  M D Schnall; Y Imai; J Tomaszewski; H M Pollack; R E Lenkinski; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Incidental advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed at the time of radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Antonio Di Meglio; Pier Vitale Nuzzo; Francesco Ricci; Bruno Spina; Francesco Boccardo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Targeted Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score Heterogeneity and Implications for Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Shane Mesko; Leonard Marks; Omar Ragab; Shyamal Patel; Daniel A Margolis; D Jeffrey Demanes; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.787

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.