Literature DB >> 1711590

Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

S A McSherry1, F Levy, M L Schiebler, B Keefe, G A Dent, J L Mohler.   

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging is important for proper selection of patients for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Preoperative staging by digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Gleason grade and prostate specific antigen was compared to pathological stage for 25 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. The predictive value for tumor confinement was 36% by rectal examination, 37% by ultrasound and 30% by MRI. The predictive value for extracapsular disease was 100% by rectal examination, 83% by ultrasound and 66% by MRI. Preoperative determinations of tumor volume by any modality did not correlate with pathological tumor volume. Digital rectal examination, ultrasound and MRI clinically understage the disease in most patients but they may be reliable to predict extracapsular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1711590     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37720-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Unmet needs in the prediction and detection of metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor; Mario Eisenberger; Michael W Kattan; Bertrand Tombal; Frederic Lecouvet
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-06

3.  The value of PSA, free-to-total PSA ratio and PSA density in the prediction of pathologic stage for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Güven Aslan; Bora Irer; Aykut Kefi; Ilhan Celebi; Kutsal Yörükoğlu; Adil Esen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Probability of seminal vesicle involvement in localized prostatic carcinoma. Significance in conformal radiotherapy].

Authors:  H J Feldmann; J Breul; F Zimmermann; S Wachter; T Wiegel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Primary staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  G J Jager; J O Barentz; E T Ruijter; J J de la Rosette; G O Oosterhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  T Tarcan; L Türkeri; T Biren; S Küllü; N Gürmen; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  A review of prostate cancer imaging, positron emission tomography, and radiopharmaceutical-based therapy.

Authors:  Amy Pawson; Zonia Ghumman; Phillip H Kuo; Hossein Jadvar; Twyla Bartel; Bobby Shayegan; Katherine Zukotynski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse pathologic features prediction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Prediction of pathological tumor volume in clinically localized prostate cancer: value of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Lencioni; I Menchi; A Paolicchi; M Carini; A Amorosi; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Can we predict real T3 stage prostate cancer in patients with clinical T3 (cT3) disease before radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.