Literature DB >> 9065513

Failure of centrally placed objects to control the firing fields of hippocampal place cells.

A Cressant1, R U Muller, B Poucet.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that the angular position of hippocampal place cell firing fields is accurately controlled by the position of a single white cue card attached to the wall of a recording cylinder: when the card is rotated, fields rotate equally. In this study, we asked whether similar control could be exerted by three-dimensional objects placed directly in the recording arena. In each of several conditions, the locations of the objects relative to each other and their distances from the cylinder wall were fixed. In Experiment 1, the objects were all near the center of the cylinder. In this condition, the angular position of firing fields could, in general, not be predicted from the angular position of the object set. When a white wall card was added to the object arrangement, the stimulus ensemble exerted nearly ideal control over angular firing position. Nevertheless, when the card was withdrawn, the objects still did not control field position. In Experiment 2, place cells were recorded in the presence of two new arrangements of the same objects used in Experiment 1. In the "clustered objects" condition, the objects were placed next to each other, 10 cm from the wall. In the "objects-at-periphery" condition, the objects were put against the cylinder wall by equally increasing the distances among the objects. In both conditions, we found virtually ideal control by the objects over angular field position. These results indicate that the failure of stimulus control in Experiment 1 must be attributable to the arrangement of the objects and not to the nature of the objects themselves. Overall, the results are in line with behavioral studies that show that it is very difficult to teach rats to locate food relative to landmarks inside the behavioral arena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9065513      PMCID: PMC6573492     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Lesions of the rat postsubiculum impair performance on spatial tasks.

Authors:  J S Taube; J P Kesslak; C W Cotman
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1992-03

2.  Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; A Speakman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.

Authors:  T S Collett; B A Cartwright; B A Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning.

Authors:  R Biegler; R G Morris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  B Poucet
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A driveable bundle of microwires for collecting single-unit data from freely-moving rats.

Authors:  J L Kubie
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1984-01

7.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  R G Morris; P Garrud; J N Rawlins; J O'Keefe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The firing of hippocampal place cells predicts the future position of freely moving rats.

Authors:  R U Muller; J L Kubie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat's recent experience.

Authors:  G J Quirk; R U Muller; J L Kubie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Binding of hippocampal CA1 neural activity to multiple reference frames in a landmark-based navigation task.

Authors:  K M Gothard; W E Skaggs; K M Moore; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  49 in total

1.  Accumulation of hippocampal place fields at the goal location in an annular watermaze task.

Authors:  S A Hollup; S Molden; J G Donnett; M B Moser; E I Moser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial reorientation by geometry with freestanding objects and extended surfaces: a unifying view.

Authors:  Tommaso Pecchia; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Head direction cell representations maintain internal coherence during conflicting proximal and distal cue rotations: comparison with hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  D Yoganarasimha; Xintian Yu; James J Knierim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; John A King; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Independence of landmark and self-motion-guided navigation: a different role for grid cells.

Authors:  Bruno Poucet; Francesca Sargolini; Eun Y Song; Balázs Hangya; Steven Fox; Robert U Muller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries.

Authors:  Christian F Doeller; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Kadharbatcha S Saleem; Chris I Baker; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Responses of dorsal subicular neurons of rats during object exploration in an extended environment.

Authors:  Michael I Anderson; Shane M O'Mara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.