Literature DB >> 18408152

Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory.

Christian F Doeller1, John A King, Neil Burgess.   

Abstract

How the memory systems centered on the hippocampus and dorsal striatum interact to support behavior remains controversial. We used functional MRI while people learned the locations of objects by collecting and replacing them over multiple trials within a virtual environment comprising a landmark, a circular boundary, and distant cues for orientation. The relative location of landmark and boundary was occasionally changed, with specific objects paired with one or other cue, allowing dissociation of learning and performance relative to either cue. Right posterior hippocampal activation reflected learning and remembering of boundary-related locations, whereas right dorsal striatal activation reflected learning and remembering of landmark-related locations. Within the right hippocampus, anterior processing of environmental change (spatial novelty) was dissociated from posterior processing of location. Behavioral studies show that landmark-related learning obeys associative reinforcement, whereas boundary-related learning is incidental [Doeller CF, Burgess N (2008) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5909-5914]. The distinct incidental hippocampal processing of boundaries is suggestive of a "geometric module" or "cognitive map" and may explain the hippocampal support of incidental/observational learning in "declarative" or "episodic" memory versus the striatal support of trial-and-error learning in "procedural" memory. Finally, the hippocampal and striatal systems appear to combine "bottom-up," simply influencing behavior proportional to their activations, without direct interaction, with "top-down" ventromedial prefrontal involvement when both are similarly active.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18408152      PMCID: PMC2311337          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801489105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

1.  Loss of the thalamic nuclei for "head direction" impairs performance on spatial memory tasks in rats.

Authors:  L A Wilton; A L Baird; J L Muir; R C Honey; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Preserved fronto-striatal plasticity and enhanced procedural learning in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease overexpressing mutant hAPPswe.

Authors:  Silvia Middei; Raffaella Geracitano; Antonio Caprioli; Nicola Mercuri; Martine Ammassari-Teule
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories.

Authors:  Terra D Barnes; Yasuo Kubota; Dan Hu; Dezhe Z Jin; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Selective enhancement of associative learning by microstimulation of the anterior caudate.

Authors:  Ziv M Williams; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems.

Authors:  L R Squire; S M Zola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory.

Authors:  R Hirsh
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1974-12

8.  Interaction between the human hippocampus and the caudate nucleus during route recognition.

Authors:  Nicol C Voermans; Karl Magnus Petersson; Leonie Daudey; Bernd Weber; Karel P Van Spaendonck; Hubertus P H Kremer; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Cortico-striatal contributions to feedback-based learning: converging data from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

Authors:  D Shohamy; C E Myers; S Grossman; J Sage; M A Gluck; R A Poldrack
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The hippocampus is required for short-term topographical memory in humans.

Authors:  Tom Hartley; Chris M Bird; Dennis Chan; Lisa Cipolotti; Masud Husain; Faraneh Vargha-Khadem; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  170 in total

1.  Spatial reorientation by geometry with freestanding objects and extended surfaces: a unifying view.

Authors:  Tommaso Pecchia; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  The role of the basal ganglia in learning and memory: insight from Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Karin Foerde; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 4.  Visual spatial cognition in neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 0.881

5.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Alex T Keinath; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein; Isabel A Muzzio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Geometric and featural systems, separable and combined: Evidence from reorientation in people with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-08-10

7.  Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-24

8.  Homologous involvement of striatum and prefrontal cortex in rodent and human water maze learning.

Authors:  Daniel G Woolley; Annelies Laeremans; Ilse Gantois; Dante Mantini; Ben Vermaercke; Hans P Op de Beeck; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth; Lutgarde Arckens; Rudi D'Hooge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Human cortical θ during free exploration encodes space and predicts subsequent memory.

Authors:  Joseph Snider; Markus Plank; Gary Lynch; Eric Halgren; Howard Poizner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Michael F Brown; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.