Literature DB >> 8437622

Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning.

R Biegler1, R G Morris.   

Abstract

Neurons sensitive to both place and direction from distinct regions of the hippocampal formation, allometric relationships between spatial learning and hippocampal structure and pronounced impairments in spatial learning after lesions in this area, indicate that the hippocampal formation subserves allocentric spatial learning. To learn more about the process of spatial representation, we have developed a task that provides independent control of both landmark and directional cues. On the basis of physiological and behavioural work, this task also makes it possible to investigate the relevance of associative learning principles, such as predictability, to the spatial domain. We report here that although rats learn to discriminate between landmarks on the basis of their proximity to a reliably predicted food reward, they will only learn to use them to represent its location if they maintain stable locations within a geometric frame of reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8437622     DOI: 10.1038/361631a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Spatial and nonspatial escape strategies in the Barnes maze.

Authors:  Fiona E Harrison; Randall S Reiserer; Andrew J Tomarken; Michael P McDonald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 3.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Using an evolutionary algorithm to determine the parameters of a biologically inspired model of head direction cells.

Authors:  Theocharis Kyriacou
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Failure of centrally placed objects to control the firing fields of hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  A Cressant; R U Muller; B Poucet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial and reversal learning in the Morris water maze are largely resistant to six hours of REM sleep deprivation following training.

Authors:  Christine M Walsh; Victoria Booth; Gina R Poe
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Substratal idiothetic navigation of rats is impaired by removal or devaluation of extramaze and intramaze cues.

Authors:  A Stuchlik; A A Fenton; J Bures
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Optimal cue combination and landmark-stability learning in the head direction system.

Authors:  Kate J Jeffery; Hector J I Page; Simon M Stringer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Hippocampal synaptic plasticity: role in spatial learning or the automatic recording of attended experience?

Authors:  R G Morris; U Frey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Dissociation of exteroceptive and idiothetic orientation cues: effect on hippocampal place cells and place navigation.

Authors:  J Bures; A A Fenton; Y Kaminsky; J Rossier; B Sacchetti; L Zinyuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.