Literature DB >> 9061832

Categorical relations in shape perception.

J E Hummel1, B J Stankiewicz.   

Abstract

Many researchers have proposed that objects are perceived as structural descriptions, which specify the configuration of an object's features (or parts) in terms of their categorical relations to one another. Others have proposed that objects are perceived as views, which specify the configuration of an object's features in terms of their coordinates, in particular 2D views. This paper presents five experiments testing these competing accounts of the perception of the configuration of an object's features. Subjects learned to recognize a set of target objects and were tested for their ability to distinguish them from various distractors that differed either in their categorical relations or their coordinates. Subjects were consistently more likely to confuse both 2D and 3D objects that were similar in their parts' relations to each other than to confuse objects similar in their parts' coordinates (in any reference frame). This effect persisted when subjects were allowed to view the objects as long as they wished and when they were explicitly trained to distinguish them from the distractors. These findings suggest that we perceive an object's features in terms of their categorical relations to one another. A preliminary model of the findings is presented.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9061832     DOI: 10.1163/156856896x00141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  17 in total

1.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition.

Authors:  L J Rosielle; E E Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

3.  Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views.

Authors:  David H Foster; Stuart J Gilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations.

Authors:  Thomas A Busey; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

5.  Topological Relations Between Objects Are Categorically Coded.

Authors:  Andrew Lovett; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08-07

6.  Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Jonathan R Rein; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2012-02-21

7.  Separability of abstract-category and specific-exemplar visual object subsystems: evidence from fMRI pattern analysis.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Rebecca G Deason; Vaughn R Steele; Wilma Koutstaal; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Attentional coding of categorical relations in scene perception: evidence from the flicker paradigm.

Authors:  Luke J Rosielle; Brian T Crabb; Eric E Cooper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

9.  Dissociable neural subsystems underlie visual working memory for abstract categories and specific exemplars.

Authors:  Chad J Marsolek; E Darcy Burgund
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Bias effects in the possible/impossible object decision test with matching objects.

Authors:  Anja Soldan; H John Hilton; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.