Literature DB >> 18405042

Dissociable neural subsystems underlie visual working memory for abstract categories and specific exemplars.

Chad J Marsolek1, E Darcy Burgund.   

Abstract

An ongoing debate concerns whether visual object representations are relatively abstract, relatively specific, both abstract and specific within a unified system, or abstract and specific in separate and dissociable neural subsystems. Most of the evidence for the dissociable subsystems theory has come from experiments that used familiar shapes, and the usage of familiar shapes has allowed for alternative explanations for the results. Thus, we examined abstract and specific visual working memory when the stimuli were novel objects viewed for the first and only time. When participants judged whether cues and probes belonged to the same abstract visual category, they performed more accurately when the probes were presented directly to the left hemisphere than when they were presented directly to the right hemisphere. In contrast, when participants judged whether or not cues and probes were the same specific visual exemplar, they performed more accurately when the probes were presented directly to the right hemisphere than when they were presented directly to the left hemisphere. For the first time, results from experiments using visual working memory tasks support the dissociable subsystems theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18405042     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.8.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  47 in total

1.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects.

Authors:  I Biederman; M Bar
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

3.  BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; William G Hayward; Michael J Tarr; Adam W Anderson; Pawel Skudlarski; John C Gore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  T Poggio; S Edelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: implications for studying cerebral asymmetry.

Authors:  T R Jordan; G R Patching; A D Milner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-05

7.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions.

Authors:  D L Schacter; L A Cooper; S M Delaney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere.

Authors:  C J Marsolek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The role of the cerebral hemispheres in specific versus abstract priming.

Authors:  Michal Schnaider Beeri; Eli Vakil; Abraham Adonsky; Shalom Levenkron
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2004-07
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge is power: how conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

Review 2.  Can theories of visual representation help to explain asymmetries in amygdala function?

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Hemispheric asymmetry of visual scene processing in the human brain: evidence from repetition priming and intrinsic activity.

Authors:  W Dale Stevens; Itamar Kahn; Gagan S Wig; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Separability of abstract-category and specific-exemplar visual object subsystems: evidence from fMRI pattern analysis.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Rebecca G Deason; Vaughn R Steele; Wilma Koutstaal; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Hemispheric asymmetries in motivation neurally dissociate self-description processes.

Authors:  Chad J Marsolek; Colin G DeYoung; W Scott Domansky; Rebecca G Deason
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-12-03

6.  When side matters: hemispheric processing and the visual specificity of emotional memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Elizabeth S Choi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The temporal dynamics of visual object priming.

Authors:  Philip C Ko; Bryant Duda; Erin P Hussey; Emily J Mason; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Conflicting demands of abstract and specific visual object processing resolved by frontoparietal networks.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Chad J Marsolek; Brianna K Morseth; MacKenzie F Speer; Philip C Burton; E Darcy Burgund
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Infant VEPs reveal neural correlates of implicit naming: Lateralized differences between lexicalized versus name-unknown pictures.

Authors:  Suzy J Styles; Kim Plunkett; Mihaela D Duta
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.