Literature DB >> 12120795

Attentional coding of categorical relations in scene perception: evidence from the flicker paradigm.

Luke J Rosielle1, Brian T Crabb, Eric E Cooper.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether the positions of objects in a scene are coded relative to one another categorically (i.e., above, below, or side of; Experiment 1) and to determine whether spatial position in scene perception is coded preattentively or only under focused attention (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, participants viewed alternating versions of a scene in which one of the objects in the scene changed its categorical relationship to the closest object in the scene, changed only its metric relationship to the closest object in a scene, or appeared and disappeared. Participants were faster at detecting changes that disrupted categorical relations than at detecting changes that disrupted only metric relations. In Experiment 2, this categorical advantage still occurred even when participants were cued to the location of the change. These results suggest that categorical spatial relations are being coded in scene perception and that attention is required in order to encode spatial relations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120795     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Active and passive scene recognition across views.

Authors:  R F Wang; D J Simons
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

2.  Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition.

Authors:  L J Rosielle; E E Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

3.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Connectedness and the integration of parts with relations in shape perception.

Authors:  J Saiki; J E Hummel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-08

6.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).

Authors:  M J Tarr; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape.

Authors:  B J Stankiewicz; J E Hummel; E E Cooper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Connectedness and part-relation integration in shape category learning.

Authors:  J Saiki; J E Hummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Not-So-CLEVR: learning same-different relations strains feedforward neural networks.

Authors:  Junkyung Kim; Matthew Ricci; Thomas Serre
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Beyond the feedforward sweep: feedback computations in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Gabriel Kreiman; Thomas Serre
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Visual attention during spatial language comprehension.

Authors:  Michele Burigo; Pia Knoeferle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.