Literature DB >> 9058252

Validation of reflectance pulse oximetry: an evaluation of a new sensor in piglets.

R Nijland1, S Nierlich, H W Jongsma, J G Nijhuis, B Oeseburg, K Springer, P Mannheimer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A new reflectance pulse oximetry sensor, developed for intrapartum estimation of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), was calibrated and evaluated. The sensor contains two light emitting diodes of 735 and 890 nm, and a photodetector at a distance of 14 mm from both light emitting diodes.
METHODS: In seven Yorkshire/Hampshire piglets, the reflectance sensor (Nellcor Puritan Bennett Inc.) was calibrated using blood sample SaO2 values. The resulting calibration line was evaluated in four Dutch piglets, by comparing pulse oximetry saturation readings (SpO2) with blood sample and intravascular fiberoptic oximetry SaO2 values. Several reflectance sensors were fixed on each animal. Desaturation levels were obtained by changing the gas mixture of oxygen/ nitrous oxide via a tracheal catheter.
RESULTS: In the Yorkshire/ Hampshire piglets, the standard deviation of difference (SpO2-SaO2) was 4.7% (n = 364), over an SaO2 range of 17% to 100%. In the Dutch piglets, the mean difference (SpO2-SaO2) was -1.6% and the standard deviation of difference was 5.4%, over the same SaO2 range (n = 254). Comparisons of continuous recordings of reflectance SpO2 and fiberoptic SaO2 revealed variation in individual regression lines.
CONCLUSIONS: This new 735/890 nm reflectance sensor demonstrates acceptable accuracy in piglets. A further evaluation during labor should assess its feasibility for fetal surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9058252     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007332105965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  17 in total

1.  In vitro investigation of the factors affecting pulse oximetry.

Authors:  J P de Kock; L Tarassenko
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-01

2.  Simple photon diffusion analysis of the effects of multiple scattering on pulse oximetry.

Authors:  J M Schmitt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Continuous monitoring of fetal oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry.

Authors:  A Luttkus; T W Fengler; W Friedmann; J W Dudenhausen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Reflectance pulse oximetry in fetal lambs: subcutaneous vessels and vasoconstriction affect its reliability.

Authors:  R Nijland; H W Jongsma; I M Verbruggen; J G Nijhuis
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-05

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Fetal pulse oximetry: a new method of monitoring the fetus.

Authors:  N Johnson; V A Johnson; H McNamara; I A Montague; H W Jongsma; Z Aumeerally; J K Gupta; E van Oudgaarden; R J Lilford; D Miller
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry: fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relation to delivery outcome.

Authors:  G A Dildy; P P van den Berg; M Katz; S L Clark; H W Jongsma; J G Nijhuis; C A Loucks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Artifacts in fetal pulse oximetry: nonarterial pulsatile signals.

Authors:  C M Schram; J O Gardosi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Noninvasive pulse oximetry in children with cyanotic congenital heart disease.

Authors:  R A Boxer; I Gottesfeld; S Singh; M A LaCorte; V A Parnell; P Walker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  The skin of domestic mammals as a model for the human skin, with special reference to the domestic pig.

Authors:  W Meyer; R Schwarz; K Neurand
Journal:  Curr Probl Dermatol       Date:  1978
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hypoxia driven opioid targeted automated device for overdose rescue.

Authors:  Mohammad S Imtiaz; Charles V Bandoian; Thomas J Santoro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.