STUDY DESIGN: Fresh calf lumbar spines were used to perform flexibility tests in multiple loading directions to compare the stabilizing effects of anterior and posterior rigid instrumentations. OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical flexibility of anterior and posterior instrumentation constructs using an unstable calf spine model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine can be managed anteriorly or posteriorly. Controversy persists, however, on the merit of anterior fixation versus that of posterior fixation in terms of how much stability can be achieved. METHODS: Fifteen fresh calf spines (L2-L5) were loaded with pure unconstrained moments in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending directions. After removal of L3-L4 disc and endplates to create an 1.5-cm anterior and middle column defect, testing was performed on five specimens after anterior Kaneda rod fixation, anterior University Plate fixation, or posterior ISOLA pedicle screw fixation (AcroMed, Cleveland, OH). Testing was repeated after inserting a polymethylmethacrylate block to stimulate an interbody anterior graft with instrumentation. RESULTS: All fixation devices provided a significant stabilizing effect in flexion and lateral bending. In extension, all constructs except ISOLA (AcroMed) without graft were stiffer than the intact specimen. In axial rotation with no graft, only the Kaneda device significantly reduced the flexibility from that of the intact specimen. The interbody graft provided additional rigidity to the ISOLA (AcroMed) instrumentation construct in flexion and extension and to the Kaneda construct in lateral bending. There was no significant effect of grafting in axial rotation. CONCLUSIONS: A short, transpedicular instrumentation, such as ISOLA (AcroMed), provided less rigid fixation in flexion and extension without the anterior structural graft. The Kaneda rod and University plate with grafting provided a significant stabilizing effect in all directions compared with the intact specimen. When no graft was inserted, the Kaneda device was more effective in preventing axial rotation than the other devices. In lateral bending, the University plate provided more rigid fixation than the Kaneda device without grafting.
STUDY DESIGN: Fresh calf lumbar spines were used to perform flexibility tests in multiple loading directions to compare the stabilizing effects of anterior and posterior rigid instrumentations. OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical flexibility of anterior and posterior instrumentation constructs using an unstable calf spine model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine can be managed anteriorly or posteriorly. Controversy persists, however, on the merit of anterior fixation versus that of posterior fixation in terms of how much stability can be achieved. METHODS: Fifteen fresh calf spines (L2-L5) were loaded with pure unconstrained moments in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending directions. After removal of L3-L4 disc and endplates to create an 1.5-cm anterior and middle column defect, testing was performed on five specimens after anterior Kaneda rod fixation, anterior University Plate fixation, or posterior ISOLA pedicle screw fixation (AcroMed, Cleveland, OH). Testing was repeated after inserting a polymethylmethacrylate block to stimulate an interbody anterior graft with instrumentation. RESULTS: All fixation devices provided a significant stabilizing effect in flexion and lateral bending. In extension, all constructs except ISOLA (AcroMed) without graft were stiffer than the intact specimen. In axial rotation with no graft, only the Kaneda device significantly reduced the flexibility from that of the intact specimen. The interbody graft provided additional rigidity to the ISOLA (AcroMed) instrumentation construct in flexion and extension and to the Kaneda construct in lateral bending. There was no significant effect of grafting in axial rotation. CONCLUSIONS: A short, transpedicular instrumentation, such as ISOLA (AcroMed), provided less rigid fixation in flexion and extension without the anterior structural graft. The Kaneda rod and University plate with grafting provided a significant stabilizing effect in all directions compared with the intact specimen. When no graft was inserted, the Kaneda device was more effective in preventing axial rotation than the other devices. In lateral bending, the University plate provided more rigid fixation than the Kaneda device without grafting.
Authors: M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 1.000