Gregory M Mundis1, Robert K Eastlack1, Payam Moazzaz2, Alexander W L Turner3, G Bryan Cornwall3. 1. Scripps Clinic Division of Orthopedic Surgery, San Diego, CA ; San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, CA. 2. Orthopaedic Specialists of North County, Tri-City Medical Center Orthopaedic and Spine Institute, Oceanside, CA. 3. NuVasive, Inc., San Diego, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expandable cages are gaining popularity in anterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine following corpectomy as they can provide adjustable distraction and deformity correction. Rectangular, rather than circular, endcaps provide increased resistance to subsidence by spanning the apophyseal ring; however their impact on construct stability is not known. The objective of this study was to investigate the contribution of expandable corpectomy cage endcap shape (round vs. rectangular) and fixation method (anterior plate vs. posterior pedicle screws) to the stability of an L1 sub-total corpectomy construct. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (T11-L3) were subjected to multi-directional flexibility testing to 6 N·m with a custom spine simulator. Test conditions were: intact, L1 sub-total corpectomy defect, expandable cage (round endcap) alone, expandable cage (round endcap) with anterior plate, expandable cage (round endcap) with bilateral pedicle screws, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) alone, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) with anterior plate, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) with bilateral pedicle screws. Range-of-motion across T12-L2 was measured with an optoelectronic system. RESULTS: The expandable cage alone with either endcap provided significant stability to the corpectomy defect, reducing motion to intact levels in flexion-extension with both endcap types, and in lateral bending with rectangular endcaps. Round endcaps allowed greater motion than intact in lateral bending, and axial rotation ROM was greater than intact for both endcaps. Supplemental fixation provided the most rigid constructs, although there were no significant differences between instrumentation or endcap types. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest anterior-only fixation may be adequate when using an expandable cage in a sub-total corpectomy application and choice of endcap type may be driven by other factors such as subsidence resistance.
BACKGROUND: Expandable cages are gaining popularity in anterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine following corpectomy as they can provide adjustable distraction and deformity correction. Rectangular, rather than circular, endcaps provide increased resistance to subsidence by spanning the apophyseal ring; however their impact on construct stability is not known. The objective of this study was to investigate the contribution of expandable corpectomy cage endcap shape (round vs. rectangular) and fixation method (anterior plate vs. posterior pedicle screws) to the stability of an L1 sub-total corpectomy construct. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (T11-L3) were subjected to multi-directional flexibility testing to 6 N·m with a custom spine simulator. Test conditions were: intact, L1 sub-total corpectomy defect, expandable cage (round endcap) alone, expandable cage (round endcap) with anterior plate, expandable cage (round endcap) with bilateral pedicle screws, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) alone, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) with anterior plate, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) with bilateral pedicle screws. Range-of-motion across T12-L2 was measured with an optoelectronic system. RESULTS: The expandable cage alone with either endcap provided significant stability to the corpectomy defect, reducing motion to intact levels in flexion-extension with both endcap types, and in lateral bending with rectangular endcaps. Round endcaps allowed greater motion than intact in lateral bending, and axial rotation ROM was greater than intact for both endcaps. Supplemental fixation provided the most rigid constructs, although there were no significant differences between instrumentation or endcap types. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest anterior-only fixation may be adequate when using an expandable cage in a sub-total corpectomy application and choice of endcap type may be driven by other factors such as subsidence resistance.
Authors: Robert Pflugmacher; Philipp Schleicher; Jan Schaefer; Matti Scholz; Kathrin Ludwig; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Norbert P Haas; Frank Kandziora Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Alexander C Disch; Christian Knop; Klaus D Schaser; Michael Blauth; Werner Schmoelz Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Juan S Uribe; Elias Dakwar; Tien V Le; Ginger Christian; Sherrie Serrano; William D Smith Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Ulrich J Spiegl; Thomas Mendel; Gunther Olaf Hofmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Christoph Wipplinger; Sara Lener; Christoph Orban; Tamara M Wipplinger; Anto Abramovic; Anna Lang; Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Marc Auerswald; Philipp Messer-Hannemann; Kay Sellenschloh; Jan Wahlefeld; Klaus Püschel; Sven Hirschfeld Araujo; Michael M Morlock; Arndt P Schulz; Gerd Huber Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2020-08-03