Literature DB >> 904592

Corrections to absorbed dose calculations for tissue inhomogeneities.

M R Sontag, J R Cunningham.   

Abstract

Traditional methods for correcting for the presence of tissue inhomogeneities may produce errors as great as 10% at points within or closese to the inhomogeneities. Measurements were made in phantoms containing aluminum or cork inhomogeneities. Agreement between measured and predicted results was usually within 2%-3%.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1977        PMID： 904592     DOI： 10.1118/1.594329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN： 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  Asghar Mesbahi; Farshad Seyed Nejad
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

2.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71.

Authors:  John P Gibbons; John A Antolak; David S Followill; M Saiful Huq; Eric E Klein; Kwok L Lam; Jatinder R Palta; Donald M Roback; Mark Reid; Faiz M Khan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Monte carlo simulation of bony heterogeneity effects on dose profile for small irradiation field in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Simone C Cardoso; Victor Gabriel L Alves; Luiz Antonio R da Rosa; Luciana T Campos; Delano V S Batista; Alessandro Facure
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dose prediction accuracy of anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm beyond high density heterogeneity interface.

Authors:  Suresh B Rana
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-01

Review 6.  Computed tomography imaging parameters for inhomogeneity correction in radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Indra J Das; Chee-Wai Cheng; Minsong Cao; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  The use of radiochromic EBT2 film for the quality assurance and dosimetric verification of 3D conformal radiotherapy using Microtek ScanMaker 9800XL flatbed scanner.

Authors:  G S Sim; J H D Wong; K H Ng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Percentage depth dose evaluation in heterogeneous media using thermoluminescent dosimetry.

Authors:  L A R da Rosa; S C Cardoso; L T Campos; V G L Alves; D V S Batista; A Facure
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of commercially available three-dimensional treatment planning algorithms for monitor unit calculations in the presence of heterogeneities.

Authors:  J R Butts; A E Foster
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Inhomogeneity correction and the analytic anisotropic algorithm.

Authors:  Don Robinson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.102
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.