Literature DB >> 9045812

Nonadaptive mutations occur on the F' episome during adaptive mutation conditions in Escherichia coli.

P L Foster1.   

Abstract

One of the most studied examples of adaptive mutation is a strain of Escherichia coli, FC40, that cannot utilize lactose (Lac-) but that readily reverts to lactose utilization (Lac+) when lactose is its sole carbon source. Adaptive reversion to Lac+ occurs at a high rate when the Lac- allele is on an F' episome and conjugal functions are expressed. It was previously shown that nonselected mutations on the chromosome did not appear in the Lac- population while episomal Lac+ mutations accumulated, but it remained possible that nonselected mutations might occur on the episome. To investigate this possibility, a second mutational target was created on the Lac- episome by mutation of a Tn1O element, which encodes tetracycline resistance (Tetr), to tetracycline sensitivity (Tets). Reversion rates to Tetr during normal growth and during lactose selection were measured. The results show that nonselected Tetr mutations do accumulate in Lac- cells when those cells are under selection to become Lac+. Thus, reversion to Lac+ in FC40 does not appear to be adaptive in the narrow sense of the word. In addition, the results suggest that during lactose selection, both Lac+ and Tetr mutations are created or preserved by the same recombination-dependent mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9045812      PMCID: PMC178865          DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.5.1550-1554.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  39 in total

1.  Preparing and using agarose microbeads.

Authors:  M Koob; W Szybalski
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism.

Authors:  R E Lenski; J E Mittler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Opposing roles of the holliday junction processing systems of Escherichia coli in recombination-dependent adaptive mutation.

Authors:  R S Harris; K J Ross; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Host/vector interactions which affect the viability of recombinant phage lambda clones.

Authors:  K F Wertman; A R Wyman; D Botstein
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Mutagenic specificity of ultraviolet light.

Authors:  J H Miller
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Adaptive reversion of an episomal frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli requires conjugal functions but not actual conjugation.

Authors:  P L Foster; J M Trimarchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reverse branch migration of Holliday junctions by RecG protein: a new mechanism for resolution of intermediates in recombination and DNA repair.

Authors:  M C Whitby; L Ryder; R G Lloyd
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-10-22       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli by simple base deletions in homopolymeric runs.

Authors:  P L Foster; J M Trimarchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats.

Authors:  S M Rosenberg; S Longerich; P Gee; R S Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of stationary phase mutation: a decade of adaptive mutation.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Evidence that stationary-phase hypermutation in the Escherichia coli chromosome is promoted by recombination.

Authors:  H J Bull; G J McKenzie; P J Hastings; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Some features of the mutability of bacteria during nonlethal selection.

Authors:  V G Godoy; F S Gizatullin; M S Fox
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Hypermutation in bacteria and other cellular systems.

Authors:  B A Bridges
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Evolution of microbial diversity during prolonged starvation.

Authors:  S E Finkel; R Kolter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Are adaptive mutations due to a decline in mismatch repair? The evidence is lacking.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence.

Authors:  H J Bull; M J Lombardo; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The role of transient hypermutators in adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W A Rosche; P L Foster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effect of drug concentration on emergence of macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium avium.

Authors:  K A Nash
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.