Literature DB >> 10359804

The role of transient hypermutators in adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

W A Rosche1, P L Foster.   

Abstract

Microbial populations under nonlethal selection can give rise to mutations that relieve the selective pressure, a phenomenon that has come to be called "adaptive mutation." One explanation for adaptive mutation is that a small proportion of the cells experience a period of transient hypermutation, and that these hypermutators account for the mutations that appear. The experiments reported here investigated the contribution that hypermutators make to the mutations occurring in a Lac- strain of Escherichia coli during selection for lactose utilization. A broad mutational screen, loss of motility, was used to compare the frequency of nonselected mutations in starved Lac- cells, in Lac+ revertants, and in Lac+ revertants carrying yet another nonselected mutation. These frequencies allowed us to calculate that the hypermutating subpopulation makes up approximately 0.06% of the population and that its mutation rate is elevated approximately 200-fold. From these numbers we conclude that the hypermutators are responsible for nearly all multiple mutations but produce only approximately 10% of the adaptive Lac+ mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10359804      PMCID: PMC22007          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Evidence that gene amplification underlies adaptive mutability of the bacterial lac operon.

Authors:  D I Andersson; E S Slechta; J R Roth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Mutation and cancer: the antecedents to our studies of adaptive mutation.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Mismatch repair protein MutL becomes limiting during stationary-phase mutation.

Authors:  R S Harris; G Feng; K J Ross; R Sidhu; C Thulin; S Longerich; S K Szigety; M E Winkler; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Selection for high mutation rates in chemostats.

Authors:  E C Cox; T C Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Adaptive mutation: the uses of adversity.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 15.500

8.  Genetic and sequence analysis of frameshift mutations induced by ICR-191.

Authors:  M P Calos; J H Miller
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-11-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. III. Additional correlation of mutational sites with specific amino acid residues.

Authors:  C Coulondre; J H Miller
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Mechanisms of directed mutation.

Authors:  P L Foster; J Cairns
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of stationary phase mutation: a decade of adaptive mutation.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Evidence that stationary-phase hypermutation in the Escherichia coli chromosome is promoted by recombination.

Authors:  H J Bull; G J McKenzie; P J Hastings; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The SOS response regulates adaptive mutation.

Authors:  G J McKenzie; R S Harris; P L Lee; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Some features of the mutability of bacteria during nonlethal selection.

Authors:  V G Godoy; F S Gizatullin; M S Fox
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence.

Authors:  H J Bull; M J Lombardo; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mutations arise independently of transcription in non-dividing bacteria.

Authors:  D Barionovi; P Ghelardini; G Di Lallo; L Paolozzi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 8.  Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2000

9.  Error-prone polymerase, DNA polymerase IV, is responsible for transient hypermutation during adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Joshua D Tompkins; Jennifer L Nelson; Jill C Hazel; Stacy L Leugers; Jeffrey D Stumpf; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Adaptive mutation: general mutagenesis is not a programmed response to stress but results from rare coamplification of dinB with lac.

Authors:  E Susan Slechta; Kim L Bunny; Elisabeth Kugelberg; Eric Kofoid; Dan I Andersson; John R Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.