Literature DB >> 9042559

Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin after major orthopaedic surgery is cost effective.

L C Borris1, M R Lassen.   

Abstract

The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the socioeconomic consequences of routine administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, on the basis of data from a number of clinical studies. Despite the higher direct costs associated with LMWH, this regimen was more cost effective per thromboembolic complication prevented than no prophylaxis, dextran 70, or low dose unfractionated heparin. A sensitivity analysis was performed to address the outcome when the main factors in the economic analysis were changed; this had no significant effect on the conclusions of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9042559     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199600527-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  7 in total

1.  The economics of general thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Authors:  D Bergqvist; S Jendteg; B Lindgren; T Mätzsch; U Persson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Deep venous thrombosis: a continuing problem.

Authors:  J H Scurr; P D Coleridge-Smith; J H Hasty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-07-02

3.  Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) vs dextran 70. The prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. The Danish Enoxaparin Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-08

4.  Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis following total hip replacement surgery with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Authors:  J Menzin; R Richner; D Huse; G A Colditz; G Oster
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins in elective hip surgery. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  L C Borris; M R Lassen; H P Jensen; B S Andersen; K A Poulsen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.366

6.  Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus warfarin prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; D R Anderson; R Goeree
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Incidence of posthospitalization proximal deep venous thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. A pilot study.

Authors:  A Trowbridge; C K Boese; B Woodruff; H H Brindley; W E Lowry; T E Spiro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Duplex Ultrasonography Has Limited Utility in Detection of Postoperative DVT After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shaleen Vira; Austin J Ramme; Michael J Alaia; David Steiger; Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Frederick Jaffe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 2.  Enoxaparin. A review of its clinical potential in the management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Measuring the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic consequences of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sean D Sullivan; Susan R Kahn; Bruce L Davidson; Lars Borris; Patrick Bossuyt; Gary Raskob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.