Literature DB >> 7921522

Perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins in elective hip surgery. Clinical and economic considerations.

L C Borris1, M R Lassen, H P Jensen, B S Andersen, K A Poulsen.   

Abstract

A review and meta analysis of randomized prophylaxis studies in total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery with the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) compounds presently marketed in Europe. Thromboprophylaxis with recommended dosages of LMWH was significantly more effective than both placebo (no prophylaxis), dextran 70 and low-dose unfractionated heparin (UH) (5,000 IU thrice daily) in terms of protection against objectively diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which is the main source of postoperative pulmonary embolism. The efficacy of LMWH was similar to that of adjusted-dose UH but only 2 studies have been conducted with this regimen so far. When combined with 0.5 mg dihydroergotamine (DHE), UH was as effective as LMWH, but DHE bears a definite risk of circulatory disturbances in the lower limbs. In all studies LMWH prophylaxis was safe under the clinical conditions. A cost-effectiveness analysis based on the reported efficacy and safety of LMWH in the European studies showed that, compared with no prophylaxis, dextran 70, and low-dose UH, LMWH prophylaxis used routinely in patients undergoing THA is more profitable for the health care system due to fewer expenses used on treatment of postoperative thromboembolic complications. LMWH therefore leads to better utilization of the economic resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7921522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0946-1965            Impact factor:   1.366


  8 in total

1.  Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin after major orthopaedic surgery is cost effective.

Authors:  L C Borris; M R Lassen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Enoxaparin. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in thromboembolic prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Economics of thromboprophylaxis in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Harrison; D J Warwick; J Coast
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Cost effectiveness of the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  D R Anderson; B J O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Nadroparin calcium. A review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  R Davis; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Economic evaluation of the use of nadroparin calcium in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in surgical patients in Italy.

Authors:  A Lloyd; J A Aitken; U K Hoffmeyer; E J Kelso; E C Wakerly; N D Barber
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Measuring the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic consequences of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sean D Sullivan; Susan R Kahn; Bruce L Davidson; Lars Borris; Patrick Bossuyt; Gary Raskob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.