Literature DB >> 1714709

Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) vs dextran 70. The prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. The Danish Enoxaparin Study Group.

.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized study compared the thromboprophylactic efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin (40.6 mg subcutaneously once daily), with a standard regimen of dextran 70 in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed by bilateral ascending phlebography 7 to 11 days after operation. Two hundred forty-six patients were included and 219 were eligible for analysis. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in seven of 108 patients in the LMWH group and in 24 of 111 patients in the dextran group. Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism did not develop in any patients during the study. In the postoperative period, patients receiving LMWH had a lower blood loss in drains and required fewer blood transfusions than patients receiving dextran, although no significant differences were noted between the groups with respect to the total number of blood transfusions required. Bleeding events and adverse events did not differ between the groups. None of the patients died in hospital during the study. One patient in the LMWH group died at home 15 days after the operation. Three patients receiving dextran had development of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis after hospital discharge. In conclusion, enoxaparin was a more effective thromboprophylactic than a standard regimen of dextran in patients undergoing total hip replacement. The two regimens were equally safe under the clinical conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1714709     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.151.8.1621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of postdischarge administration of enoxaparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after total hip replacement. A prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  A Planes; N Vochelle; J Y Darmon; M Fagola; M Bellaud; D Compan; E Saliba; N Weisslinger; Y Huet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin after major orthopaedic surgery is cost effective.

Authors:  L C Borris; M R Lassen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Effectiveness and safety of bemiparin versus low-molecular weight heparins in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  R Ferriols-Lisart; F Ferriols-Lisart; V Jiménez-Torres
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2002-06

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of the treatment of embolic disorders.

Authors:  D M Lutomski; M Bottorff; K Sangha
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  G F Pineo; R D Hull
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  A comparative review of the adverse effect profiles of heparins and heparinoids.

Authors:  L C Borris; M R Lassen
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Enoxaparin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and clinical applications in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  S Noble; D H Peters; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.