Literature DB >> 9042397

Mismatch repair provokes chromosome aberrations in hamster cells treated with methylating agents or 6-thioguanine, but not with ethylating agents.

M J Armstrong1, S M Galloway.   

Abstract

O6-Methylguanine (O6MeG) is important in induction of chromosome aberrations (abs), with the unusual property that new abs are produced in the second cycle after treatment; cells lacking repair by O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase (AGT) have more abs at the second division (M2) than at the first (M1). These second-cycle abs are likely caused by attempted correction by mismatch repair (MMR) of O6MeG:T mispairs, since we previously showed that MMR-deficient human cells (MT1 lymphoblasts) treated with SN-1 methylating agents do not produce new abs at M2 and are resistant to killing. Here we used MMR-deficient rodent cells to examine ab induction by alkylators and by incorporated 6-thioguanine (6-tG) which produces mispairs. BrdUrd labeling was used to identify cells at first, second and third metaphase after treatment (M1, M2 and M3). MMR-deficient Chinese hamster Clone B cells were 10-fold more resistant to ab induction by methyl nitrosourea and 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine compared to their MMR-proficient parent cells, CHO MT+. Both cell lines express AGT and can remove the methyl group from O6MeG. Clone B has twice the AGT activity of CHO MT+, but inhibition of AGT with O6-benzylguanine did not change ab induction, indicating that methylation tolerance of Clone B cells was due to defective MMR and not to increased repair of O6MeG. Confirming the importance of O6MeG in inducing abs, even when it is a minor component of the adducts induced, Clone B cells were 2-fold more resistant to ab induction by methyl methanesulfonate and dimethylsulfate, whereas they had normal sensitivity to ethyl nitrosourea and 1-ethyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine. Clone B cells are also resistant to killing by 6-tG, and 6-tG induced few abs in MMR-deficient Clone B (6-fold lower than CHO MT+ cells). Since mispairs do not occur until the cell cycle following incorporation of 6-tG, new abs in MMR-proficient cells are expected one cell cycle later than with the methylators, i.e., at M3. As expected, in normal CHO MT+, high ab levels were seen at M3, but there was also ab induction at M2. Similarly, with methylating agents we saw higher levels of abs at M1 in the MMR-proficient CHO MT+ cells than in Clone B cells, suggesting that in the rodent cells, MMR is involved in ab formation from mispairs or modified base pairs induced in the first S-phase, such as O6MeG:C. These rodent cells thus differ from human MT1 lymphoblasts which had similar ab levels to their normal parent cells at the first metaphase after treatment with methylators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9042397     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(96)00234-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

Review 1.  Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks.

Authors:  Michael D Wyatt; Douglas L Pittman
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Recognition of DNA alterations by the mismatch repair system.

Authors:  G Marra; P Schär
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  The homologous recombination protein RAD51D mediates the processing of 6-thioguanine lesions downstream of mismatch repair.

Authors:  Preeti Rajesh; Alexandra V Litvinchuk; Douglas L Pittman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  RAD51D protects against MLH1-dependent cytotoxic responses to O(6)-methylguanine.

Authors:  Preeti Rajesh; Changanamkandath Rajesh; Michael D Wyatt; Douglas L Pittman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 5.  Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Authors:  Joanna Klapacz; Lynn H Pottenger; Bevin P Engelward; Christopher D Heinen; George E Johnson; Rebecca A Clewell; Paul L Carmichael; Yeyejide Adeleye; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.657

6.  Thiopurine-induced mitotic catastrophe in Rad51d-deficient mammalian cells.

Authors:  Michael D Wyatt; Nicole M Reilly; Shikha Patel; Preeti Rajesh; Gary P Schools; Phillip G Smiraldo; Douglas L Pittman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.579

7.  Alkylation damage causes MMR-dependent chromosomal instability in vertebrate embryos.

Authors:  Harma Feitsma; Alper Akay; Edwin Cuppen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Binding of MutS protein to oligonucleotides containing a methylated or an ethylated guanine residue, and correlation with mutation frequency.

Authors:  Kentaro Taira; Shintaro Nakamura; Khota Nakano; Daisuke Maehara; Keinosuke Okamoto; Sakae Arimoto; David Loakes; Leroy Worth; Roel M Schaaper; Kohji Seio; Mitsuo Sekine; Kazuo Negishi; Tomoe Negishi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 2.433

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.