Literature DB >> 27036068

Contributions of DNA repair and damage response pathways to the non-linear genotoxic responses of alkylating agents.

Joanna Klapacz1, Lynn H Pottenger2, Bevin P Engelward3, Christopher D Heinen4, George E Johnson5, Rebecca A Clewell6, Paul L Carmichael7, Yeyejide Adeleye7, Melvin E Andersen6.   

Abstract

From a risk assessment perspective, DNA-reactive agents are conventionally assumed to have genotoxic risks at all exposure levels, thus applying a linear extrapolation for low-dose responses. New approaches discussed here, including more diverse and sensitive methods for assessing DNA damage and DNA repair, strongly support the existence of measurable regions where genotoxic responses with increasing doses are insignificant relative to control. Model monofunctional alkylating agents have in vitro and in vivo datasets amenable to determination of points of departure (PoDs) for genotoxic effects. A session at the 2013 Society of Toxicology meeting provided an opportunity to survey the progress in understanding the biological basis of empirically-observed PoDs for DNA alkylating agents. Together with the literature published since, this review discusses cellular pathways activated by endogenous and exogenous alkylation DNA damage. Cells have evolved conserved processes that monitor and counteract a spontaneous steady-state level of DNA damage. The ubiquitous network of DNA repair pathways serves as the first line of defense for clearing of the DNA damage and preventing mutation. Other biological pathways discussed here that are activated by genotoxic stress include post-translational activation of cell cycle networks and transcriptional networks for apoptosis/cell death. The interactions of various DNA repair and DNA damage response pathways provide biological bases for the observed PoD behaviors seen with genotoxic compounds. Thus, after formation of DNA adducts, the activation of cellular pathways can lead to the avoidance of a mutagenic outcome. The understanding of the cellular mechanisms acting within the low-dose region will serve to better characterize risks from exposures to DNA-reactive agents at environmentally-relevant concentrations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological pathways; DNA damage; DNA repair; Dose–response; Low-dose; Points of departure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27036068      PMCID: PMC4818947          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res        ISSN: 1383-5742            Impact factor:   5.657


  125 in total

1.  In vivo mutagenesis by O6-methylguanine built into a unique site in a viral genome.

Authors:  E L Loechler; C L Green; J M Essigmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Methylation-induced blocks to in vitro DNA replication.

Authors:  K Larson; J Sahm; R Shenkar; B Strauss
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  DNA damage-triggered apoptosis: critical role of DNA repair, double-strand breaks, cell proliferation and signaling.

Authors:  Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  MSH2 and ATR form a signaling module and regulate two branches of the damage response to DNA methylation.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jun Qin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Background levels of DNA damage in the population.

Authors:  R L Saul; B N Ames
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1986

6.  The adaptive imbalance in base excision-repair enzymes generates microsatellite instability in chronic inflammation.

Authors:  Lorne J Hofseth; Mohammed A Khan; Mark Ambrose; Olga Nikolayeva; Meng Xu-Welliver; Maria Kartalou; S Perwez Hussain; Richard B Roth; Xiaoling Zhou; Leah E Mechanic; Irit Zurer; Varda Rotter; Leona D Samson; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Base excision repair intermediates induce p53-independent cytotoxic and genotoxic responses.

Authors:  Robert W Sobol; Maria Kartalou; Karen H Almeida; Donna F Joyce; Bevin P Engelward; Julie K Horton; Rajendra Prasad; Leona D Samson; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Serge Boiteux; Marie Guillet
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004-01-05

9.  Lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase mu reveals a template-dependent, sequence-independent nucleotidyl transferase activity.

Authors:  Shay Covo; Luis Blanco; Zvi Livneh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Nonenzymatic methylation of DNA by the intracellular methyl group donor S-adenosyl-L-methionine is a potentially mutagenic reaction.

Authors:  B Rydberg; T Lindahl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Polymerases and DNA Repair in Neurons: Implications in Neuronal Survival and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Xiaoling Li; Guanghui Cao; Xiaokang Liu; Tie-Shan Tang; Caixia Guo; Hongmei Liu
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.147

2.  Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Hugh A Barton; Alan Boobis; Rachel Brunner; Harvey Clewell; Rhian Cope; Jeffrey Dawson; Jeanne Domoradzki; Peter Egeghy; Pankaj Gulati; Brandall Ingle; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kelly Lowe; Anna Lowit; Elizabeth Mendez; David Miller; Jeffrey Minucci; James Nguyen; Alicia Paini; Monique Perron; Katherine Phillips; Hua Qian; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Fiona Sewell; Philip Villanueva; John Wambaugh; Michelle Embry
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Plants genotoxicity as pollution bioindicator in Jordan using comet assay.

Authors:  Wesam Al Khateeb
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2017-12-13

4.  Sorafenib improves alkylating therapy by blocking induced inflammation, invasion and angiogenesis in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Alfeu Zanotto-Filho; Subapriya Rajamanickam; Eva Loranc; V Pragathi Masamsetti; Aparna Gorthi; July Carolina Romero; Sonal Tonapi; Rosangela Mayer Gonçalves; Robert L Reddick; Raymond Benavides; John Kuhn; Yidong Chen; Alexander J R Bishop
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Somatic Mutation Profiling in Head and Neck Paragangliomas.

Authors:  Maria Savvateeva; Anna Kudryavtseva; Elena Lukyanova; Anastasiya Kobelyatskaya; Vladislav Pavlov; Maria Fedorova; Elena Pudova; Zulfiya Guvatova; Dmitry Kalinin; Alexander Golovyuk; Elizaveta Bulavkina; Irina Katunina; George Krasnov; Anastasiya Snezhkina
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.134

6.  BPDE-induced genotoxicity: relationship between DNA adducts, mutagenicity in the in vitro PIG-A assay, and the transcriptional response to DNA damage in TK6 cells.

Authors:  Ann Liza Piberger; Christopher T Krüger; Bettina M Strauch; Beatrice Schneider; Andrea Hartwig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Biological Basis for Threshold Responses to Methylating Agents.

Authors:  Adam D Thomas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 8.  Overview of New Treatments with Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer and a Proposal of a Combination Therapy.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Galván Morales; Raúl Barrera Rodríguez; Julio Raúl Santiago Cruz; Luis M Teran
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  DNA Repair Molecular Beacon assay: a platform for real-time functional analysis of cellular DNA repair capacity.

Authors:  Jianfeng Li; David Svilar; Steven McClellan; Jung-Hyun Kim; Eun-Young Erin Ahn; Conchita Vens; David M Wilson; Robert W Sobol
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 10.  Mammalian DNA Polymerase Kappa Activity and Specificity.

Authors:  Hannah R Stern; Jana Sefcikova; Victoria E Chaparro; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.