Literature DB >> 21205838

The homologous recombination protein RAD51D mediates the processing of 6-thioguanine lesions downstream of mismatch repair.

Preeti Rajesh1, Alexandra V Litvinchuk, Douglas L Pittman, Michael D Wyatt.   

Abstract

Thiopurines are extensively used as immunosuppressants and in the treatment of childhood cancers, even though there is concern about therapy-induced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes resulting from thiopurine use. Following metabolic activation, thiopurines are incorporated into DNA and invoke mismatch repair (MMR). Recognition of 6-thioguanine (6-thioG) in DNA by key MMR proteins results in cell death rather than repair. There are suggestions that homologous recombination (HR) is involved downstream of MMR following thiopurine treatment, but the precise role of HR is poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that cells deficient in RAD51D (a RAD51 paralogue) are extremely sensitive to 6-thioG. This sensitivity is almost completely rescued by the deletion of Mlh1, which suggests that HR is involved in the repair of the 6-thioG-induced recombinogenic lesions generated by MMR. Furthermore, 6-thioG induces chromosome aberrations in the Rad51d-deficient cells. Interestingly, Rad51d-deficient cells show a striking increase in the frequency of triradial and quadriradial chromosomes in response to 6-thioG therapy. The presence of these chromatid exchange-type aberrations indicates that the deficiency in RAD51D-dependent HR results in profound chromosomal damage precipitated by the processing of 6-thioG by MMR. The radials are notable as an important source of chromosomal translocations, which are the most common class of mutations found in hematologic malignancies. This study thus suggests that HR insufficiency could be a potential risk factor for the development of secondary cancers that result from long-term use of thiopurines in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21205838      PMCID: PMC3041871          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  34 in total

1.  Mechanisms of tolerance to DNA damaging therapeutic drugs.

Authors:  P Karran
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Dominant effects of an Msh6 missense mutation on DNA repair and cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Guohze Yang; Stefan J Scherer; Scarlet S Shell; Kan Yang; Mimi Kim; Martin Lipkin; Raju Kucherlapati; Richard D Kolodner; Winfried Edelmann
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  Mismatch repair and DNA damage signalling.

Authors:  Lovorka Stojic; Richard Brun; Josef Jiricny
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 4.  Human mismatch repair, drug-induced DNA damage, and secondary cancer.

Authors:  Peter Karran; Judith Offman; Margherita Bignami
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.079

5.  A method for staining 3T3 cell nuclei with propidium iodide in hypotonic solution.

Authors:  E H Tate; M E Wilder; L S Cram; W Wharton
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1983-11

6.  Methotrexate/6-mercaptopurine maintenance therapy influences the risk of a second malignant neoplasm after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the NOPHO ALL-92 study.

Authors:  Kjeld Schmiegelow; Ibrahim Al-Modhwahi; Mette Klarskov Andersen; Mikael Behrendtz; Erik Forestier; Henrik Hasle; Mats Heyman; Jon Kristinsson; Jacob Nersting; Randi Nygaard; Anne Louise Svendsen; Kim Vettenranta; Richard Weinshilboum
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  An Msh2 point mutation uncouples DNA mismatch repair and apoptosis.

Authors:  Diana P Lin; Yuxun Wang; Stefan J Scherer; Alan B Clark; Kan Yang; Elena Avdievich; Bo Jin; Uwe Werling; Tchaiko Parris; Naoto Kurihara; Asad Umar; Raju Kucherlapati; Martin Lipkin; Thomas A Kunkel; Winfried Edelmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  CHK1 and CHK2 are differentially involved in mismatch repair-mediated 6-thioguanine-induced cell cycle checkpoint responses.

Authors:  Tao Yan; Anand B Desai; James W Jacobberger; R Michael Sramkoski; Tamalette Loh; Timothy J Kinsella
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  Segmental chromosomal aberrations and centrosome amplifications: pathogenetic mechanisms in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma?

Authors:  J I Martín-Subero; U Knippschild; L Harder; T F E Barth; J Riemke; S Grohmann; S Gesk; J Höppner; P Möller; R M Parwaresch; R Siebert
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Telomere maintenance requires the RAD51D recombination/repair protein.

Authors:  Madalena Tarsounas; Purificacíon Muñoz; Andreas Claas; Phillip G Smiraldo; Douglas L Pittman; María A Blasco; Stephen C West
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multi-omics data integration analysis identifies the spliceosome as a key regulator of DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Dana Sherill-Rofe; Oded Raban; Steven Findlay; Dolev Rahat; Irene Unterman; Arash Samiei; Amber Yasmeen; Zafir Kaiser; Hellen Kuasne; Morag Park; William D Foulkes; Idit Bloch; Aviad Zick; Walter H Gotlieb; Yuval Tabach; Alexandre Orthwein
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 2.  Structural, molecular and cellular functions of MSH2 and MSH6 during DNA mismatch repair, damage signaling and other noncanonical activities.

Authors:  Michael A Edelbrock; Saravanan Kaliyaperumal; Kandace J Williams
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Thiopurine-induced mitotic catastrophe in Rad51d-deficient mammalian cells.

Authors:  Michael D Wyatt; Nicole M Reilly; Shikha Patel; Preeti Rajesh; Gary P Schools; Phillip G Smiraldo; Douglas L Pittman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.579

Review 4.  Exploiting DNA repair defects in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Reilly; Luca Novara; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  SLX4 dampens MutSα-dependent mismatch repair.

Authors:  Jean-Hugues Guervilly; Marion Blin; Luisa Laureti; Emilie Baudelet; Stéphane Audebert; Pierre-Henri Gaillard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.