Literature DB >> 9040277

Caring about risks. Are severely depressed patients competent to consent to research?

C Elliott1.   

Abstract

Depressed patients are often asked to take part in clinical research studies that carry risk. These patients are generally assumed to be mentally competent to consent to research, since depression often leaves a patient's cognitive abilities intact. In this article, it is argued that many severely depressed patients may not be competent to consent because they cannot be considered accountable for their decisions. The article presents 2 arguments: first, that it is unclear whether the decisions of some severely depressed patients are authentically theirs, and second, that some severely depressed patients may not have the appropriate minimal degree of concern for their own well-being. It is argued that assessments of competence must take account of emotional factors, and that, if severely depressed patients are incompetent to consent, research studies involving a poor risk-benefit ratio will be much more difficult to justify.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9040277     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830140021003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  24 in total

1.  [Mental competence and neuropsychologic impairments in demented patients].

Authors:  J Vollmann; K-P Kühl; A Tilmann; H D Hartung; H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T.

Authors:  Torsten Marcus Breden; Jochen Vollmann
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2004-12

3.  The Ethics of Clinical Trials Research in Severe Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Allison C Nugent; Franklin G Miller; Ioline D Henter; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  The ethics of research on deep brain stimulation for depression: decisional capacity and therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Carl Erik Fisher; Laura B Dunn; Paul P Christopher; Paul E Holtzheimer; Yan Leykin; Helen S Mayberg; Sarah H Lisanby; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Teaching ethics of psychopharmacology research in psychiatric residency training programs.

Authors:  Eugene V Beresin; Ross J Baldessarini; Jonathan Alpert; Jerrold Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Authenticity and psychiatric disorder: does autonomy of personal preferences matter?

Authors:  Manne Sjöstrand; Niklas Juth
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-02

7.  Ethical considerations for involving Latina adolescents in mental health research.

Authors:  Allison L McCord
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2017-05-02

8.  Depression and competence to refuse psychiatric treatment.

Authors:  A Rudnick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  A Liberal Account of Addiction.

Authors:  Bennett Foddy; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Philos Psychiatr Psychol       Date:  2010-03-01

10.  Ethical Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Focus on Risk and Consent.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Paul E Holtzheimer; Jinger G Hoop; Helen S Mayberg; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.