Literature DB >> 14722659

[Mental competence and neuropsychologic impairments in demented patients].

J Vollmann1, K-P Kühl, A Tilmann, H D Hartung, H Helmchen.   

Abstract

The study aim was to examine if neuropsychological tests and clinical dementia scales identify incompetent patients with dementia. Eighteen demented outpatients (ICD-10: F00-F03) underwent psychiatric examination, neuropsychological testing, and formal (MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool Treatment, Hopkins Competency Assessment Test) and clinical assessment of competence. Clinical dementia scales but not neuropsychological testing correlate with formal and clinical assessment of competence in patients with dementia. Our results do not support a neuropsychological model of competence assessment. However, in cases with poor results in clinical dementia scales, clinicians should assess the patients' competence in more detail. It remains open which is the best and ethically grounded methodology for competence assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14722659     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-003-1514-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  13 in total

1.  [Opinion of the "Ethical and Just Questions" work group for neuropsychopharmacology and pharmacopsychiatry (AGNP)].

Authors:  N Nedopil; J Aldenhoff; K Amelung; F X Eich; J Fritze; M Gastpar; W Maier
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.788

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Appreciation and emotion: theoretical reflections on the MacArthur Treatment Competence Study.

Authors:  Louis C Charland
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1998-12

4.  The Hopkins Competency Assessment Test: a brief method for evaluating patients' capacity to give informed consent.

Authors:  J S Janofsky; R J McCarthy; M F Folstein
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1992-02

Review 5.  Caring about risks. Are severely depressed patients competent to consent to research?

Authors:  C Elliott
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-02

Review 6.  Assessment of competency: the role of neurobehavioral deficits.

Authors:  M Freedman; D T Stuss; M Gordon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Criteria for patient decision making (in)competence: a review of and commentary on some empirical approaches.

Authors:  S P Welie
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2001

8.  Competence of mentally ill patients: a comparative empirical study.

Authors:  J Vollmann; A Bauer; H Danker-Hopfe; H Helmchen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Comparison of standards for assessing patients' capacities to make treatment decisions.

Authors:  T Grisso; P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Toward a neurologic model of competency: Cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer's disease using three different legal standards.

Authors:  D C Marson; A Chatterjee; K K Ingram; L E Harrell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Physician-assisted suicide in dementia?].

Authors:  H Lauter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T.

Authors:  Torsten Marcus Breden; Jochen Vollmann
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2004-12

Review 3.  [Advance directives in patients with mental disorders. Scope, prerequisites for validity, and clinical implementation].

Authors:  J Vollmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  [Research on humans suffering from dementia].

Authors:  H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  [Ethical questions in clinical research with the mentally ill].

Authors:  H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.