Literature DB >> 12042398

Depression and competence to refuse psychiatric treatment.

A Rudnick1.   

Abstract

Individuals with major depression may benefit from psychiatric treatment, yet they may refuse such treatment, sometimes because of their depression. Hence the question is raised whether such individuals are competent to refuse psychiatric treatment. The standard notion of competence to consent to treatment, which refers to expression of choice, understanding of medical information, appreciation of the personal relevance of this information, and logical reasoning, may be insufficient to address this question. This is so because major depression may not impair these four abilities while it may disrupt coherence of personal preferences by changing them. Such change may be evaluated by comparing the treatment preferences of the individual during the depression to his or her treatment preferences during normal periods. If these preferences are consistent, they should be respected. If they are not consistent, or past treatment preferences that were arrived at competently cannot be established, treatment refusal may have to be overridden or ignored so as to alleviate the depression and then determine the competent treatment decision of the individual. Further study of the relation between depression and competence to refuse or consent to psychiatric treatment is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12042398      PMCID: PMC1733573          DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.3.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  21 in total

1.  Correlates of insight in serious mental illness.

Authors:  R W Goldberg; L D Green-Paden; A F Lehman; J M Gold
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.254

2.  Beyond cognition: the role of disordered affective states in impairing competence to consent to treatment.

Authors:  H J Bursztajn; H P Harding; T G Gutheil; A Brodsky
Journal:  Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Caring about risks. Are severely depressed patients competent to consent to research?

Authors:  C Elliott
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-02

4.  Competence as accountability.

Authors:  C Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1991

5.  Unlimited human autonomy - a cultural bias?

Authors:  S M Glick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Does depression invalidate competence? Consultants' ethical, psychiatric, and legal considerations.

Authors:  E W Young; J C Corby; R Johnson
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  On the notion of psychosis: the DSM-IV in perspective.

Authors:  A Rudnick
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.944

8.  ECT and special problems of informed consent.

Authors:  C M Culver; R B Ferrell; R M Green
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  The effect of recovery from depression on preferences for life-sustaining therapy in older patients.

Authors:  M Lee; L Ganzini
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-01

Review 10.  Depression, competence, and the right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment.

Authors:  M D Sullivan; S J Youngner
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Normal variants of competence to consent to treatment.

Authors:  Abraham Rudnick; David Roe
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-06

2.  Evaluating medico-legal decisional competency criteria.

Authors:  Demian Whiting
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2015-06

3.  Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR): How Can We Optimize Outcomes in CNS Research?

Authors:  Mitali Wadekar; Anil Sharma; Gina Battaglia
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

4.  The Need for Authenticity-Based Autonomy in Medical Ethics.

Authors:  Lucie White
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-09

5.  Decision-making capacity should not be decisive in emergencies.

Authors:  Dieneke Hubbeling
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-05

6.  Unreasonable reasons: normative judgements in the assessment of mental capacity.

Authors:  Natalie F Banner
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Depression, possibilities, and competence: a phenomenological perspective.

Authors:  Gerben Meynen
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-06

8.  Taking part in a pharmacogenetic clinical trial: assessment of trial participants understanding of information disclosed during the informed consent process.

Authors:  Diana Rose; Jasna Russo; Til Wykes
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Capacity, value neutrality and the ability to consider the future.

Authors:  Jillian Craigie
Journal:  Int J Law Context       Date:  2013-03

Review 10.  Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Hindmarch; Matthew Hotopf; Gareth S Owen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.