Literature DB >> 9038403

Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting.

C Spence1, J Driver.   

Abstract

Subjects judged the elevation (up vs. down, regardless of laterality) of peripheral auditory or visual targets, following uninformative cues on either side with an intermediate elevation. Judgements were better for targets on either modality when preceded by an uninformative auditory cue on the side of the target. Experiment 2 ruled out nonattentional accounts for these spatial cuing effects. Experiment 3 found that visual cues affected elevation judgments for visual but not auditory targets. Experiment 4 confirmed that the effect on visual targets was attentional. In Experiment 5, visual cues produced spatial cuing when targets were always auditory, but saccades toward the cue may have been responsible. No such visual-to-auditory cuing effects were found in Experiment 6 when saccades were prevented, though they were present when eye movements were not monitored. These results suggest a one-way cross-modal dependence in exogenous covert orienting whereby audition influences vision, but not vice versa. Possible reasons for this asymmetry are discussed in terms of the representation of space within the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9038403     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  99 in total

1.  A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Katherine Fairbank; Alan Kingstone; Anne P Hillstrom; Kimron Shapiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  When does visual perceptual grouping affect multisensory integration?

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Jason S Chan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state.

Authors:  Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  "Acoustical vision" of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Francesca Frassinetti; Andrea Serino; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cross-modal integration in a dart-poison frog.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Daniela S Grabul; Kiran K Soma; Philippe Gaucher; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Separate attentional resources for vision and audition.

Authors:  David Alais; Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.