Literature DB >> 21053771

Short-term repeatability of joint space width measurements using a magnetic resonance imaging compatible knee positioning device.

M F Koff1, D W Stanley, P J Weishaar, K K Amrami, K R Kaufman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible knee positioning device to aid in minimizing intratechnologist and intertechnologist differences of minimum joint space width (JSW) measurements. Five subjects were scanned by two separate technologists, with and without an MRI-compatible positioning device. A semi-automated program calculated the minimum JSW of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. The scan-to-scan repeatability was evaluated from measurements between serial scans without subject repositioning, and the intratechnologist and intertechnologist repeatabilities were evaluated when the subject was removed from the magnet and repositioned by an individual technologist. The root mean square (RMS) error of the JSW measurements was also calculated. All measures of scan-to-scan repeatability and intratechnologist repeatability were unchanged with the MRI-compatible positioning device. The intertechnologist repeatability decreased from 0.70 to 0.42 mm, and the RMS error was significantly reduced (P = 0.0006) from 0.26 to 0.15 mm for the tibiofemoral joint. The variability of patellofemoral JSW measurements increased when using the positioning device; however, the increases were not statistically significant. The intertechnologist repeatability increased from 1.55 to 1.79 mm, and the RMS error increased from 0.58 to 0.73 mm. The MRI-compatible positioning device was successful at reducing JSW measurement variability at the tibiofemoral joint. The increase in measurement variability at the patellofemoral joint may be due to local incongruities of the articular surfaces. An MRI-compatible positioning device may be beneficial for quantitative longitudinal studies evaluating knee joint health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21053771      PMCID: PMC3909960          DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  29 in total

1.  Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults--United States, 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  The cartilaginous and osseous geometry of the femoral trochlear groove.

Authors:  Yi-Fen Shih; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Patellofemoral joint: evaluation during active flexion with ultrafast spoiled GRASS MR imaging.

Authors:  F G Shellock; T K Foo; A L Deutsch; J H Mink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Assessing progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a comparison between two radiographic methods.

Authors:  P Lanyon; A Jones; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; U Dürrenmatt; B Porcellini; W Rauschning
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-05

6.  Positioning device for optimal active kinematic real-time magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint: a technical note.

Authors:  Alexander Zembsch; Siegfried Trattnig; Johannes Walter; Karl-Heinz Pölzl; Peter Ritschl
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Ashley Williams; Amy Gillis; Charles McKenzie; Bruce Po; Leena Sharma; Lyle Micheli; Brian McKeon; Deborah Burstein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Schnier; M Haubner; J Priebsch; C Glaser; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knee joint under mechanical loading: Review.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.