Literature DB >> 11402228

The acceptability of urinary LCR testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among participants in a probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.

K A Fenton1, A Copas, K Mitchell, G Elam, C Carder, G Ridgway, K Wellings, B Erens, J Field, A M Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the factors that influence respondents' willingness to participate in urinary testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in a general population feasibility survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.
METHODS: 199 sexually experienced, 18-44 year old participants, recruited as part of a larger (n=901) methodological study of sexual attitudes and lifestyles, were invited to provide a urine sample for chlamydial infection testing using ligase chain reaction (LCR) techniques. Analysis of the survey data and in-depth qualitative interviews were undertaken to explore the factors that influenced participants' decisions to participate.
RESULTS: 143/199 (72%) participants agreed to provide a urine sample. The likelihood of providing a urine sample was reduced if other individuals were present in the home at the time of interview (OR 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.90, p=0.03). Trust and rapport with the interviewer, understanding the aims of the test, sense of obligation, and perceived importance of the test were identified as additional influencing factors in the in-depth interviews.
CONCLUSIONS: Survey respondents' uncertainty or embarrassment at participating in urine testing can be overcome if they are well informed, motivated by the potential health gain, and briefed by trained and confident interviewers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11402228      PMCID: PMC1744322          DOI: 10.1136/sti.77.3.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  L Grun; J Tassano-Smith; C Carder; A M Johnson; A Robinson; E Murray; J Stephenson; A Haines; A Copas; G Ridgway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-26

2.  Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; B Andersen; F Olesen; J K Moller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

3.  Assessing participation bias in a sexual behaviour survey: implications for measuring HIV risk.

Authors:  A J Copas; A M Johnson; J Wadsworth
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 4.  The promise of integrated representative surveys about sexually transmitted diseases and behavior.

Authors:  L Ku; F L Sonenstein; C F Turner; S O Aral; C M Black
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?

Authors:  J Macleod; R Rowsell; P Horner; T Crowley; E O Caul; N Low; G D Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Screening for Chlamydia in general practice: a literature review and summary of the evidence.

Authors:  T Stokes
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-06

Review 7.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Surveys on sexual health: recent developments and future directions.

Authors:  K Wellings; J Cleland
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  'The difference in determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in a sample of young Australian women'.

Authors:  Jennifer Walker; Christopher K Fairley; Catriona S Bradshaw; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Marcus Y Chen; Jimmy Twin; Nicole Taylor; Basil Donovan; John K Kaldor; Kathleen McNamee; Eve Urban; Sandra Walker; Marian Currie; Hudson Birden; Francis Bowden; Jane Gunn; Marie Pirotta; Lyle Gurrin; Veerakathy Harindra; Suzanne Garland; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 3.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients' experiences.

Authors:  Priyamvada Paudyal; Carrie Llewellyn; Jason Lau; Mohammad Mahmud; Helen Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study.

Authors:  Loretta Brabin; Grace Thomas; Mark Hopkins; Karen O'Brien; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.