Literature DB >> 8993100

Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ).

R Launois1, J Reboul-Marty, B Henry.   

Abstract

Quality of life may be considerably reduced in patients who are suffering from chronic lower limb venous insufficiency, although existing generic quality of life instruments (NHP, SF-36 or SIP) cannot completely identify their specific complaints. The Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ) has been developed by iterative process. First, a pilot group of 20 patients was used to identify a number of important features of quality of life affected by venous insufficiency, other than physical symptoms of discomfort. A second study involving 2,001 subjects was used to reduce the number of items. Subjects were asked to score both the severity of their problems and the importance they attributed to each problem on a 5-point Likert scale. The importance items found in patients with venous insufficiency were subjected to factorial analyses (PCA, PAF). The final version is a 20-item self-administered questionnaire which explores four dimensions: psychological, physical and social functioning and pain. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was validated for each dimension (Cronbach's alpha > 0.820 for three out of four factors). Reproducibility was confirmed in a 60 patient test-retest study. Pearson's correlation coefficients for both the four dimension subscales and for the global score at 2-week intervals were greater than 0.940. Finally, the questionnaire was tested in a randomized clinical trial of 934 patients in order to assess responsiveness and the convergent validity of the instrument, together with the patient's own quality of life. This study demonstrated that convergence was valid: Pearson's correlation coefficients between clinical score differences and quality of life score differences were small (from 0.199-0.564) but were statistically different from 0 (p < 0.001). Standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) were calculated to assess sensitivity to change. SRM and ES both demonstrated considerable responsiveness to change (> 0.80). Reliability, face, content, construct validity and responsiveness were also determined for this specific quality of life questionnaire relating to venous insufficiency. Results suggest that this questionnaire may be used with confidence to assess quality of life in clinical trials on chronic venous insufficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8993100     DOI: 10.1007/bf00439228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  10 in total

1.  Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D Feeny
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Issues in the use of change scores in randomized trials.

Authors:  G R Norman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents.

Authors:  A Mehrez; A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Authors:  B Kirshner; G Guyatt
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

6.  Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; C Bombardier; P X Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  At the crossroads of venous insufficiency and hemorrhoidal disease: Daflon 500 mg--repercussions of venous insufficiency on everyday life.

Authors:  R Launois
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation.

Authors:  M H Liang; A H Fossel; M G Larson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

  10 in total
  38 in total

1.  To work in a hospital--a new risk factor for development of venous disease?

Authors:  Erich Minar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  The endovenous ASVAL method: principles and preliminary results.

Authors:  Mehmet Mahir Atasoy; Levent Oğuzkurt
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Quality of life of people with venous leg ulcers: a comparison of the discriminative and responsive characteristics of two generic and a disease specific instruments.

Authors:  Cynthia P Iglesias; Yvonne Birks; Elizabeth A Nelson; Elizabeth Scanlon; Nicky A Cullum
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule: the development of a condition-specific questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds of the lower limb.

Authors:  Patricia Price; Keith Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Socio-economic impact of endovenous thermal ablation techniques.

Authors:  Damian Kelleher; Tristan R A Lane; Ian J Franklin; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Micronised purified flavonoid fraction: a review of its use in chronic venous insufficiency, venous ulcers and haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Quality of life and the venous function of the lower limb after harvest of autologous external iliac vein grafts: a clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Masayuki Sugimoto; Masatoshi Isogai; Hiroyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Health-related quality of life during four-layer compression bandaging for venous ulcer disease: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Clarke-Moloney; J F O'Brien; P A Grace; P E Burke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Patient-reported quality-of-life after radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins compared to conventional surgery.

Authors:  R Thompson; A Lewis; C Weir
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Impact of electronic reminders on venous thromboprophylaxis after admissions and transfers.

Authors:  P E Beeler; E Eschmann; A Schumacher; J-D Studt; B Amann-Vesti; J Blaser
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.