Literature DB >> 3972947

A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

B Kirshner, G Guyatt.   

Abstract

Tests or measures in clinical medicine or the social sciences can be used for three purposes: discriminating between subjects, predicting either prognosis or the results of some other test, and evaluating change over time. The choices made at each stage of constructing a quality of life index will differ depending on the purpose of the instrument. We explore the implications of index purpose for each stage of instrument development: selection of the item pool, item scaling, item reduction, determination of reliability, of validity, and of responsiveness. At many of these stages, not only are the requirements for discriminative, predictive, and evaluative instruments not complementary, they are actually competing. Attention to instrument purpose will clarify the choices both for those developing quality of life measures and for those selecting an appropriate instrument for clinical studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3972947     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  248 in total

1.  Common colds. Reported patterns of self-care and health care use.

Authors:  E Vingilis; U Brown; B Hennen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

3.  Health related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of disease specific instruments.

Authors:  J Marinus; C Ramaker; J J van Hilten; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Measuring Quality of Live in Disorders of Sleep and Breathing.

Authors:  Marlene Reimer; W. Ward Flemons
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Validation of the KDQOL-SF: a dialysis-targeted health measure.

Authors:  J C Korevaar; M P Merkus; M A M Jansen; F W Dekker; E W Boeschoten; R T Krediet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Best practice in symptom assessment: a review.

Authors:  E McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; R S Epstein; P J Ferrie; R Jaeschke; T K Hiller
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  "Important difference" for interpreting health-related quality of life outcome measures: important to whom?

Authors:  Jackson S Y Wu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in heart failure.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; S Nogradi; S Halcrow; J Singer; M J Sullivan; E L Fallen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.