Literature DB >> 3955482

Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials.

G H Guyatt, C Bombardier, P X Tugwell.   

Abstract

While measurement of quality of life is a vital part of assessing the effect of treatment in many clinical trials, a measure that is responsive to clinically important change is often unavailable. Investigators are therefore faced with the challenge of constructing an index for a specific condition or even for a single trial. There are several stages in the development and testing of a quality-of-life measure: selecting an initial item pool, choosing the "best" items from that pool, deciding on questionnaire format, pretesting the instrument, and demonstrating the responsiveness and validity of the instrument. At each stage the investigator must choose between a rigorous, time-consuming approach to questionnaire construction that will establish the clinical relevance, responsiveness and validity of the instrument and a more efficient, less costly strategy that leaves reproducibility, responsiveness and validity untested. This article describes these options and outlines a pragmatic approach that yields consistently satisfactory disease-specific measures of quality of life.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3955482      PMCID: PMC1490966     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  19 in total

1.  Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; J W Bush; C C Berry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Measurement of pain.

Authors:  E C Huskisson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Measurement of functional capacity with visual analogue scales.

Authors:  P J Scott; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1977-11

4.  Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.

Authors:  M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Studies with pain rating scales.

Authors:  W W Downie; P A Leatham; V M Rhind; V Wright; J A Branco; J A Anderson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Should study subjects see their previous responses?

Authors:  G H Guyatt; L B Berman; M Townsend; D W Taylor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

7.  A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study.

Authors:  S M Hunt; S P McKenna; J McEwen; E M Backett; J Williams; E Papp
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.

Authors:  M Bergner; R A Bobbitt; W B Carter; B S Gilson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Accuracy of subjective measurements made with or without previous scores: an important source of error in serial measurement of subjective states.

Authors:  J Scott; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with orally administered theophylline. A double-blind, controlled study.

Authors:  M R Alexander; W L Dull; J E Kasik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  136 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

2.  Health related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of disease specific instruments.

Authors:  J Marinus; C Ramaker; J J van Hilten; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Evidence based medicine: physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  I M Ledingham
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Quality of life: a model for evaluating health for all. Conceptual considerations and policy implications.

Authors:  B Lindström
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1992

6.  Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; R S Epstein; P J Ferrie; R Jaeschke; T K Hiller
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Aspects of quality of life on treatment with felodipine.

Authors:  E Dimenäs; M A Wallander; K Svärdsudd; I Wiklund
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Development of the Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance: A New Tool to Assess Physiotherapy Students' Performance in Clinical Education.

Authors:  Brenda Mori; Dina Brooks; Kathleen E Norman; Jodi Herold; Dorcas E Beaton
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in heart failure.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; S Nogradi; S Halcrow; J Singer; M J Sullivan; E L Fallen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Translation, adaptation and validation of a Portuguese version of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II.

Authors:  João Maciel; Paulo Infante; Susana Ribeiro; André Ferreira; Artur C Silva; Jorge Caravana; Manuel G Carvalho
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.