Literature DB >> 8990743

Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods.

A N Law1, A M Bollen, S K Chen.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated dental radiographs for signs of osteoporosis using four methods: fractal dimension, microdensitometry, pixel intensity and panoramic analysis of cortical thickness. The efficacy of these methods also was compared against three standard bone density measurement techniques used to diagnose osteoporosis in bones other than the jaws: quantitative computed tomography and single- and dual-photon absorptiometry. Pixel intensity was significantly more effective than the other dental methods at distinguishing between radiographs from the osteoporotic group and the control group, although fractal dimension and microdensitometry methods also were effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8990743     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  33 in total

1.  Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density.

Authors:  A C Alman; L R Johnson; D C Calverley; G K Grunwald; D C Lezotte; J E Hokanson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Detecting low bone mineral density from dental radiographs: a mini-review.

Authors:  James Graham
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  Bone density measurements in intra-oral radiographs.

Authors:  O Nackaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner; F Zhao; C Lindh; K Karayianni; P van der Stelt; S Pavitt; H Devlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Strut analysis for osteoporosis detection model using dental panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Jeong-Hee Lee; Sang-Sun Han; Young Hyun Kim; Ho-Gul Jeong; Yoon Jeong Choi; Wonse Park
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density.

Authors:  Stuart C White; Akira Taguchi; David Kao; Sam Wu; Susan K Service; Douglas Yoon; Yoshikazu Suei; Takashi Nakamoto; Keiji Tanimoto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Cross gender-age trabecular texture analysis in cone beam CT.

Authors:  H Ling; X Yang; P Li; V Megalooikonomou; Y Xu; J Yang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Mert Zeytinoğlu; Betül İlhan; Nesrin Dündar; Hayal Boyacioğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Feasibility of cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric analysis and fractal dimension in assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in correlation with dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Raghdaa A Mostafa; Eman A Arnout; Mona M Abo El-Fotouh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Changes in the fractal dimension of peri-implant trabecular bone after loading: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Teh-Jing Mu; Dong-Won Lee; Kwang-Ho Park; Ik-Sang Moon
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.