Literature DB >> 8974727

Development of clinical practice guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

C C Johnston1.   

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines should be written for the physician who sees patients who already have or are at high risk for osteoporosis. They should also guide the physician in distinguishing between those at high and low risk and provide general guidelines for prevention of osteoporosis for the low-risk patient. Patients at high risk may require intervention to prevent further bone loss. The guidelines should be based on the strongest evidence available and be easy to comprehend and apply. Methods to identify individuals at high risk for osteoporosis must be described. Effective interventions also should be described, as should their benefits and risks. Elderly individuals who have a poor diet and little sun exposure may be vitamin D deficient unless a supplement is given. Factors that may be deleterious to the skeleton should be avoided. Weight-bearing exercise is important throughout life. Assessment of fracture risk is important in choosing candidates for intervention, especially interventions aimed at preventing osteoporosis. Measuring bone mass at any skeletal site is the necessary initial step for most individuals; measurement at the hip may best assess the risk of hip fracture. Some risk factors independent of bone mass may also aid in patient selection. The WHO has defined osteoporosis as a bone mass at least 2.5 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean of young normal. Such individuals and those with bone mass from 1 to 2.5 SDs below the mean of young normal may also be considered for intervention. The decision will depend on assessments of the risks, the costs of treatment, the desire of the patient, and the presence of other independent risk factors. The patient with an acute fracture may require an orthopedic intervention and should receive adequate analgesia. Physical therapy is an important adjunct that aids recovery. A number of therapeutic interventions, including adequate calcium intake throughout life and an adequate vitamin D intake, are available to high-risk individuals. These interventions may be recommended generally and do not require a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Similarly, a safe weight-bearing exercise program that helps to maintain muscle strength can be recommended to older patients. Other forms of therapy include hormone replacement, bisphosphonates, and calcitonin. Vitamin D analogs and selective estrogen receptor modulators may be helpful in the future. The risks and costs of each therapy should be weighed against its benefit in slowing bone loss or increasing bone mass and reducing fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8974727     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  15 in total

Review 1.  Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Femoral trabecular-pattern index and bone mineral content measurement by photon absorption in senile osteoporosis.

Authors:  M R Khairi; J H Cronin; J A Robb; D M Smith; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The loss of bone mineral with aging and its relationship to risk of fracture.

Authors:  D M Smith; M R Khairi; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group.

Authors:  U A Liberman; S R Weiss; J Bröll; H W Minne; H Quan; N H Bell; J Rodriguez-Portales; R W Downs; J Dequeker; M Favus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Calcium in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Fracture rates as a function of forearm mineral density in normal postmenopausal women: retrospective and prospective data.

Authors:  D B Cleghorn; K J Polley; M J Bellon; J Chatterton; P A Baghurst; B E Nordin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on bone mass and fracture rates in established osteoporosis: a dose-response study.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; S B Jensen; C Christiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-05

10.  Predicting various fragility fractures in women by forearm bone densitometry: a follow-up study.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; B Gullberg
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Aging and the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  D Hamerman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  The Current Understanding of Sarcopenia: Emerging Tools and Interventional Possibilities.

Authors:  Matthew J Delmonico; Darren T Beck
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2016-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.