Literature DB >> 8970934

Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

T E Read1, J D Read, L F Butterly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need for colonoscopy in patients with adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy is controversial.
METHODS: We prospectively determined the prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients at average risk for colorectal cancer, each of whose index lesion on screening fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy was a benign adenoma. Polyps found on sigmoidoscopy underwent biopsy, and colonoscopy was recommended to all patients with neoplastic polyps. Rectosigmoid adenomas were classified as diminutive (< or = 5 mm in diameter), small (6 to 10 mm in diameter), or large (> or = 11 mm in diameter).
RESULTS: Of 3496 consecutive patients referred for sigmoidoscopy, 311 had neoplastic rectosigmoid polyps; 108 of these patients were excluded from the analysis because of a history of colonic neoplasia, symptoms, prior colonic evaluation, or incomplete follow-up data. The remaining 203 patients made up the study group, and all underwent colonoscopy. Neoplasms were found in the proximal colon in 40 of 137 patients (29 percent) with diminutive index polyps, 15 of 52 patients (29 percent) with small index polyps, and 8 of 14 patients (57 percent) with large index polyps. Advanced neoplasms (adenomas > or = 10 mm in diameter, adenomas with a villous component or moderate-to-severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or frank carcinoma) were found in 8 patients (6 percent), 5 patients (10 percent), and 4 patients (29 percent), respectively. Two patients with diminutive index polyps had proximal carcinoma in situ, and two had proximal stage I carcinomas; one patient with a large index polyp had proximal stage III carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The substantial prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasms, including advanced lesions, in asymptomatic average-risk patients with rectosigmoid adenomas < or = 5 mm in diameter warrants colonoscopy in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8970934     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199701023360102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  26 in total

1.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Rectosigmoid findings are not associated with proximal colon cancer: analysis of 6 196 consecutive cases undergoing total colonoscopy.

Authors:  Makoto Okamoto; Takao Kawabe; Yutaka Yamaji; Jun Kato; Tsuneo Ikenoue; Goichi Togo; Haruhiko Yoshida; Yasushi Shiratori; Masao Omata
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Negative colorectal polyp biopsies: the utility of cutting deeper levels.

Authors:  Brian A Schick; Carolyn A McLean; David K Driman
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Clinical study using novel endoscopic system for measuring size of gastrointestinal lesion.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Oka; Takeshi Seki; Tomohiro Akatsu; Takao Wakabayashi; Kazuo Inui; Junji Yoshino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The use of high definition colonoscopy versus standard definition: does it affect polyp detection rate?

Authors:  John Richardson; Anthony Thaventhiran; Hugh Mackenzie; Benjamin Stubbs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of adenoma size in distal colon on risk for advanced adenoma of the proximal colon.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced adenomas of the rectosigmoid colon at flexible sigmoidoscopy in 3147 asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Williamson B Strum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  High-definition colonoscopy with i-Scan: better diagnosis for small polyps and flat adenomas.

Authors:  Pier Alberto Testoni; Chiara Notaristefano; Cristian Vailati; Milena Di Leo; Edi Viale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Prevalence of proximal neoplasms among asymptomatic patients according to distal colorectal findings.

Authors:  Elife Erarslan; Cansel Turkay; Ayse Isik; Burak Uz; Arif Kaya; Nuket Bavbek
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A case-cohort study for the disease natural history of adenoma-carcinoma and de novo carcinoma and surveillance of colon and rectum after polypectomy: implication for efficacy of colonoscopy.

Authors:  C-D Chen; M-F Yen; W-M Wang; J-M Wong; T H-H Chen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.