Literature DB >> 24744595

Clinical study using novel endoscopic system for measuring size of gastrointestinal lesion.

Kiyoshi Oka1, Takeshi Seki1, Tomohiro Akatsu1, Takao Wakabayashi1, Kazuo Inui1, Junji Yoshino1.   

Abstract

AIM: To verify the performance of a lesion size measurement system through a clinical study.
METHODS: Our proposed system, which consists of a conventional endoscope, an optical device, an optical probe, and a personal computer, generates a grid scale to measure the lesion size from an endoscopic image. The width of the grid scale is constantly adjusted according to the distance between the tip of the endoscope and lesion because the lesion size on an endoscopic image changes according to the distance. The shape of the grid scale was corrected to match the distortion of the endoscopic image. The distance was calculated using the amount of laser light reflected from the lesion through an optical probe inserted into the instrument channel of the endoscope. The endoscopist can thus measure the lesion size without contact by comparing the lesion with the size of the grid scale on the endoscopic image. (1) A basic test was performed to verify the relationship between the measurement error eM and the tilt angle of the endoscope; and (2) The sizes of three colon polyps were measured using our system during endoscopy. These sizes were immediately measured by scale after their removal.
RESULTS: There was no error at α = 0°. In addition, the values of eM (mean ± SD) were 0.24 ± 0.11 mm (α = 10°), 0.90 ± 0.58 mm (α = 20°) and 2.31 ± 1.41 mm (α = 30°). According to these results, our system has been confirmed to measure accurately when the tilt angle is less than 20°. The measurement error was approximately 1 mm in the clinical study. Therefore, it was concluded that our proposed measurement system was also effective in clinical examinations.
CONCLUSION: By combining simple optical equipment with a conventional endoscope, a quick and accurate system for measuring lesion size was established.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscope; Grid scale; Lesion size; Low level laser; Non-contact measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24744595      PMCID: PMC3983462          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of lesions by endoscopy: an overview.

Authors:  N Vakil
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size?

Authors:  C Margulies; B Krevsky; M F Catalano
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A new stereoscopic endoscopy system: accurate 3-dimensional measurement in vitro and in vivo with distortion-correction function.

Authors:  Kenshi Yao; Toshiyuki Matsui; Hisashi Furukawa; Tsuneyoshi Yao; Toshihiro Sakurai; Tomoko Mitsuyasu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?

Authors:  N Gopalswamy; V N Shenoy; U Choudhry; R J Markert; N Peace; M S Bhutani; C J Barde
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate.

Authors:  R E Schoen; L D Gerber; C Margulies
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T E Read; J D Read; L F Butterly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A new method for the endoscopic determination of gastrointestinal ulcer area.

Authors:  H Dancygier; D Wurbs; M Classen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Michael P Chase; Heiko Pohl; Gale S Fiarman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito; Takahiro Fujii; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Nozomu Kobayashi; Fabian Emura; Akiko Ono; Tadakazu Shimoda; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kuang I Fu; Yasushi Sano; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  How reliable is determination of ulcer size by endoscopy?

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; M Giger; L Kern; C Noll; K Study; K B Weber; A L Blum
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-11-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Validation of a novel endoscopic program for measuring the size of gastrointestinal lesions.

Authors:  Hyungchul Park; Ji Yong Ahn; Hyungil Seo; Gyu Young Pih; Hee Kyong Na; Jeong Hoon Lee; Kee Wook Jung; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Jisuk Lee; Jinwoo Jeong; Seon Ok Kim; Jung Bok Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Drum Communication Program Intervention in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment and Dementia at Nursing Home: Preliminary Evidence From Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Atsuko Miyazaki; Takashi Okuyama; Hayato Mori; Kazuhisa Sato; Masahiko Ichiki; Rui Nouchi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Integrated Multipoint-Laser Endoscopic Airway Measurements by Transoral Approach.

Authors:  Marie Neitsch; Iris-Susanne Horn; Mathias Hofer; Andreas Dietz; Miloš Fischer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.