Literature DB >> 29101563

The use of high definition colonoscopy versus standard definition: does it affect polyp detection rate?

John Richardson1, Anthony Thaventhiran2, Hugh Mackenzie2, Benjamin Stubbs2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polyp detection rate (PDR) during lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (LGIE) is of clinical importance. Detecting adenomatous polyps early in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence can halt disease progression, enabling treatment at a favourable stage. High definition colonoscopy (HDC) has been used in our hospital alongside standard definition equipment since 2011. We aim to determine what affect the use of HDC has on PDR.
METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a prospectively maintained database on all patients undergoing LGIE was performed (01/01/2012-31/12/2015), n = 15,448. Analysis tested the primary outcome of HD's effect on PDR across LGIE and secondary outcome stratified this by endoscopist group (Physician (PE), Surgeon (SE) and Nurse Endoscopist (NE)).
RESULTS: Of 15,448 patients, 1353 underwent HDC. Unmatched analysis showed PDR increased by 5.3% in this group (p < 0.001). Matched analysis considered 2288 patients from the total cohort (1144 HDC) and showed an increase of 1% in PDR with HDC (p = 0.578). Further unmatched analysis stratified by endoscopist groups showed a PDR increase of 1.8% (p = 0.375), 5.4% (p = 0.008) and 4.6% (p = 0.021) by PE, SE and NE respectively. Matched analysis demonstrated an increase of 1% (p = 0.734) and 1.5% (p = 0.701) amongst PE and NE, with a decrease of 0.6% (p = 0.883) by SE.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of HDC increased PDR across all LGIE in our hospital, though this was not clinically significant. This marginal benefit was present across all endoscopist groups with no group benefiting over another in matched analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High definition colonoscopy; Polyp detection rate; Polyp size; Standard definition colonoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29101563     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5962-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database.

Authors:  Jason E Williams; Jennifer L Holub; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  High definition colonoscopy vs. standard video endoscopy for the detection of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Subramanian; J Mannath; C J Hawkey; K Ragunath
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T E Read; J D Read; L F Butterly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Machida; Y Sano; Y Hamamoto; M Muto; T Kozu; H Tajiri; S Yoshida
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme--a realistic approach with additional benefits.

Authors:  N J West; A P Poullis; R J Leicester
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G Tribonias; A Theodoropoulou; K Konstantinidis; E Vardas; K Karmiris; N Chroniaris; G Chlouverakis; G A Paspatis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study.

Authors:  Marc Le Rhun; Emmanuel Coron; David Parlier; Jean-Michel Nguyen; Jean-Marc Canard; Afchine Alamdari; Denis Sautereau; Stanislas Chaussade; Jean-Paul Galmiche
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria Pellisé; Glòria Fernández-Esparrach; Andrés Cárdenas; Oriol Sendino; Elena Ricart; Eva Vaquero; Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Michel Zabalza; Angels Ginès; Josep M Piqué; Josep Llach; Antoni Castells
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps.

Authors:  H Shinya; W I Wolff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Inadequate Bowel Cleansing on Colonoscopic Findings in Routine Screening Practice.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Efrat L Amitay; Anton Gies; Korbinian Weigl; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Cesare Hassan; Pedro Amaro; Anurag Agrawal; Lene Brink; Wolfgang Fischbach; Matthias Hünger; Rodrigo Jover; Urpo Kinnunen; Akiko Ono; Árpád Patai; Silvia Pecere; Lucio Petruzziello; Jürgen Ferdinand Riemann; Harry Staines; Ann L Stringer; Ervin Toth; Giulio Antonelli; Lorenzo Fuccio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.