Literature DB >> 8969474

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.

C Abdala1.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) (2f1-f2) amplitude is dependent upon both the frequency ratio and level separation of the eliciting primary tones. In adults it has been established that, on average, a f2/f1 ratio of 1.22 is optimal for evoking the most robust DPOAE; DPOAE amplitude is systematically reduced when f2/f1 ratio is either increased or decreased, thus forming a bandpass function (Harris et al., 1989). The frequency ratio function (DPOAE amplitude x f2/f1 ratio) is thought to reflect the filtering properties of the cochlea (Allen and Fahey, 1993; Brown et al., 1993). Primary tone level separation also influences DPOAE amplitude, with a 10- to 15-dB level difference between the primary tones (L1 > L2) typically generating largest amplitude in adults. Equivalent studies have not been conducted in neonates. The present study evoked the 2f1-f2 DPOAE in adults, term and premature neonates to define the optimal f2/f1 ratio and L1-L2 level separation and to investigate the filtering properties of the developing cochlea. Two f2 frequencies were investigated: 1500 and 6000 Hz. F2 was held constant while f1 was varied to produce 13 frequency ratios. Primary tone level separation varied from 15 to 0- in 5-dB intervals. ANOVA were conducted on the resulting f2/f1 frequency ratio and level separation data. Results showed that the mean optimal frequency ratio for DPOAE generation is comparable in adults and neonates. Also, either a 15- or 10-dB level separation (L1 > L2) produced the largest DPOAE amplitude for adults and term neonates whereas DPOAEs from premature neonates appeared to be relatively insensitive to primary tone level separation. The f2/f1 frequency ratio functions were similar in shape, slope, and bandwidth for adults and neonates, suggesting adult-like cochlear filtering prior to term birth. This finding is in agreement with previous work from our laboratory reporting adult-like DPOAE suppression tuning curves in term-born neonates [Abdala et al., Hear. Res. (1996)].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8969474     DOI: 10.1121/1.417234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

6.  Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Rebekah G Gunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Kelly Baroch
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sandra I Oba; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.