Literature DB >> 8962572

Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging.

J N Oshinski1, W J Parks, C P Markou, H L Bergman, B E Larson, D N Ku, S Mukundan, R I Pettigrew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance (MR) phase velocity mapping could provide accurate estimates of stenosis severity and pressure gradients in aortic coarctation.
BACKGROUND: Clinical management of aortic coarctation requires determination of lesion location and severity and quantification of the pressure gradient across the constricted area.
METHODS: Using a series of anatomically accurate models of aortic coarctation, the laboratory portion of this study found that the loss coefficient (K), commonly taken to be 4.0 in the simplified Bernoulli equation delta P = KV2, was a function of stenosis severity. The values of the loss coefficient ranged from 2.8 for a 50% stenosis to 4.9 for a 90% stenosis. Magnetic resonance imaging and MR phase velocity mapping were then used to determine coarctation severity and pressure gradient in 32 patients.
RESULTS: Application of the new severity-dependent loss coefficients found that pressure gradients deviated from 1 to 17 mm Hg compared with calculations made with the commonly used value of 4.0. Comparison of MR estimates of pressure gradient with Doppler ultrasound estimates (in 22 of 32 patients) and with catheter pressure measurements (in 6 of 32 patients) supports the conclusion that the severity-based loss coefficient provides improved estimates of pressure gradients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that MRI could be used as a complete diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of aortic coarctation, by determining stenosis location and severity and by accurately estimating pressure gradients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8962572     DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00395-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  Visualization of through-plane blood flow measurements obtained from phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Per Thunberg; Anders Kähäri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Coarctation of the aorta: management, indications for intervention, and advances in care.

Authors:  Mohammed Haris Umer Usman; Pablo Rengifo-Moreno; Sean F Janzer; Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje; Christian Witzke-Sanz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-10

4.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided stenting of aortic coarctation with commercially available catheter devices in Swine.

Authors:  Amish N Raval; James D Telep; Michael A Guttman; Cengizhan Ozturk; Michael Jones; Richard B Thompson; Victor J Wright; William H Schenke; Ranil DeSilva; Ronnier J Aviles; Venkatesh K Raman; Michael C Slack; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Assessment of methodologies to calculate intraventricular pressure differences in computational models and patients.

Authors:  Francisco J Londono-Hoyos; Abigail Swillens; Joris Van Cauwenberge; Brett Meyers; Maheswara Reddy Koppula; Pavlos Vlachos; Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Coarctation of the aorta: pre and postoperative evaluation with MRI and MR angiography; correlation with echocardiography and surgery.

Authors:  D Didier; C Saint-Martin; C Lapierre; P T Trindade; N Lahlaidi; J P Vallee; A Kalangos; B Friedli; M Beghetti
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Diagnostic utility and specific considerations in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Frances M Mitchell; Sanjay K Prasad; Gerald F Greil; Peter Drivas; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Claire E Raphael
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-08

8.  Non-invasive pressure difference estimation from PC-MRI using the work-energy equation.

Authors:  Fabrizio Donati; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sohrab Fratz; Taylor Chung; Gerald F Greil; Margaret M Samyn; Andrew M Taylor; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel; Shi-Joon Yoo; Andrew J Powell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.