Literature DB >> 16267620

Coarctation of the aorta: pre and postoperative evaluation with MRI and MR angiography; correlation with echocardiography and surgery.

D Didier1, C Saint-Martin, C Lapierre, P T Trindade, N Lahlaidi, J P Vallee, A Kalangos, B Friedli, M Beghetti.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare MRI and MRA with Doppler-echocardiography (DE) in native and postoperative aortic coarctation, define the best MR protocol for its evaluation, compare MR with surgical findings in native coarctation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 136 MR studies were performed in 121 patients divided in two groups: Group I, 55 preoperative; group II, 81 postoperative. In group I, all had DE and surgery was performed in 35 cases. In group II, DE was available for comparison in 71 cases. MR study comprised: spin-echo, cine, velocity-encoded cine (VEC) sequences and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.
RESULTS: In group I, diagnosis of coarctation was made by DE in 33 cases and suspicion of coarctation and/or aortic arch hypoplasia in 18 cases. Aortic arch was not well demonstrated in 3 cases and DE missed one case. There was a close correlation between VEC MRI and Doppler gradient estimates across the coarctation, between MRI aortic arch diameters and surgery but a poor correlation in isthmic measurements. In group II, DE detected a normal isthmic region in 31 out of 35 cases. Postoperative anomalies (recoarctation, aortic arch hypoplasia, kinking, pseudoaneurysm) were not demonstrated with DE in 50% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is superior to DE for pre and post-treatment evaluation of aortic coarctation. An optimal MR protocol is proposed. Internal measurement of the narrowing does not correspond to the external aspect of the surgical narrowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16267620     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-005-9037-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  45 in total

1.  Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography and coarctation of the aorta: gradients and flow patterns in the assessment of severity.

Authors:  J S Carvalho; A N Redington; E A Shinebourne; M L Rigby; D Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-08

Review 2.  Cardiovascular applications of magnetic resonance flow and velocity measurements.

Authors:  D H Szolar; H Sakuma; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Imaging of aortic coarctation--difficult choices.

Authors:  U Sechtem
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Heart disease: functional evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  C B Higgins; H Sakuma
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Repaired coarctation: a "cost-effective" approach to identify complications in adults.

Authors:  J Therrien; S A Thorne; A Wright; P J Kilner; J Somerville
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping.

Authors:  H G Bogren; M H Buonocore
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  [3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in apnea with the rapid infusion of a paramagnetic contrast medium in studying the thoracic aorta].

Authors:  E Di Cesare; A V Giordano; G Cerone; A Splendiani; O Michelini; C Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Is echocardiography or magnetic resonance imaging superior for precoarctation angioplasty evaluation?

Authors:  A M Mendelsohn; A Banerjee; L F Donnelly; D C Schwartz
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1997-09

9.  Transverse arch hypoplasia predisposes to aneurysm formation at the repair site after patch angioplasty for coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  J Bogaert; M Gewillig; F Rademakers; H Bosmans; J Verschakelen; W Daenen; A L Baert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Accuracy and pitfalls of Doppler evaluation of the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation.

Authors:  G R Marx; H D Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of thoracic aortic disease.

Authors:  B J Holloway; D Rosewarne; R G Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Optimal imaging protocol for evaluation of aortic coarctation; time for a reappraisal.

Authors:  B J M Mulder; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Comparison of different MRI techniques for the assessment of thoracic aortic pathology: 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography, turbo spin echo and balanced steady state free precession.

Authors:  Rolf Gebker; Osama Gomaa; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Janina Rebakowski; Eckart Fleck; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Endovascular management of coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  D R Turner; P A Gaines
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 7.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 8.589

Review 8.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease : Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 9.  Sudden cardiac death from structural heart diseases in adults: imaging findings with cardiovascular computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Sang Il Choi; Bo Hwa Choi; Arthur E Stillman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Normal values for aortic diameters in children and adolescents--assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced CMR-angiography.

Authors:  Thomas Kaiser; Christian J Kellenberger; Manuela Albisetti; Eva Bergsträsser; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.