Literature DB >> 8961814

Partial matching in the Moses illusion: response bias not sensitivity.

E N Kamas1, L M Reder, M S Ayers.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that people have enormous difficulty in detecting distortions in such questions as, "How many animals of each kind did Moses take in the Ark?" Reder and Kusbit (1991) argued that the locus of the effect must be the existence of a partial-match process. Other research has suggested that this partial-match process operates at the word level and that, with adequate focus on the relevant word, the Moses illusion is greatly diminished. The present experimental results argue that those conclusions were based on a shift in response criterion with no concomitant change in ability to detect distortions. Furthermore, the data suggest that the matching process operates below the word level, at the level of distinctive features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8961814     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Measuring recognition memory.

Authors:  W Donaldson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-09

2.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

3.  Evaluating information for truthfulness: the effects of logical subordination.

Authors:  L Baker; J L Wagner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

4.  A case study of anomaly detection: shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment.

Authors:  S B Barton; A J Sanford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07

5.  Working memory: activation limitations on retrieval.

Authors:  J R Anderson; L M Reder; C Lebiere
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.468

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states.

Authors:  B L Schwartz; D M Travis; A M Castro; S M Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  Susceptibility to semantic illusions: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  B Hannon; M Daneman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

3.  Slowing presentation speed increases illusions of knowledge.

Authors:  Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

4.  Listeners consider alternative speaker productions in discourse comprehension and memory: Evidence from beat gesture and pitch accenting.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Scott H Fraundorf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

5.  Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency.

Authors:  Nadia M Brashier; Sharda Umanath; Roberto Cabeza; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-03-23

6.  Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Establishing causal coherence across sentences: an ERP study.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Martin Paczynski; Tali Ditman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Benzodiazepines and semantic memory: effects of lorazepam on the Moses illusion.

Authors:  Marie Izaute; Laurence Paire-Ficout; Elisabeth Bacon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Processing anomalous anaphors.

Authors:  Anne E Cook
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

10.  The Locus Preservation Hypothesis: Shared Linguistic Profiles across Developmental Disorders and the Resilient Part of the Human Language Faculty.

Authors:  Evelina Leivada; Maria Kambanaros; Kleanthes K Grohmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.