Literature DB >> 8350739

A case study of anomaly detection: shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment.

S B Barton1, A J Sanford.   

Abstract

Although the establishment of a coherent mental representation depends on semantic analysis, such analysis is not necessarily complete. This is illustrated by failures to notice the anomaly in questions such as, "When an airplane crashes, where should the survivors be buried?" Four experiments were carried out to extend knowledge of what determines the incidental detection of the critical item. Detection is a function of the goodness of global fit of the item (Experiments 1 and 2) and the extent to which the scenario predicts the item (Experiment 3). Global good fit appears to result in shallow processing of details. In Experiment 4, it is shown that if satisfactory coherence can be established without detailed semantic analysis, through the recruitment of suitable information from a sentence, then processing is indeed shallow. The studies also show that a text is not understood by first producing a local semantic representation and then incorporating this into a global model, and that semantic processing is not strictly incremental.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8350739     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  Inference during reading.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.

Authors:  K Rayner; L Frazier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A verbal illusion.

Authors:  P C Wason; S S Reich
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter; J D Woolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-06
  4 in total
  26 in total

1.  Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis.

Authors:  F Ferreira; K Christianson; A Hollingworth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-01

2.  Susceptibility to semantic illusions: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  B Hannon; M Daneman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

3.  Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: an application of the change-detection paradigm.

Authors:  Patrick Sturt; Anthony J Sanford; Andrew Stewart; Eugene Dawydiak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Learning errors from fiction: difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Lisa K Fazio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

6.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

7.  Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Partial matching in the Moses illusion: response bias not sensitivity.

Authors:  E N Kamas; L M Reder; M S Ayers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

9.  Validating presupposed versus focused text information.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Kevin G Solar; Jackie Spear
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

10.  Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions.

Authors:  Martin Paczynski; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.